Preview

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics

Advanced search

Genetic markers of the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in age-related macular degeneration

https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-0011

EDN: ODYTQW

Abstract

Objective. To systematically review and critically appraise current evidence on genetic markers associated with the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD).

Methods. A literature analysis covering the period 2005–2025 was performed, including candidate gene studies, meta-analyses, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Genetic variants in CFH, ARMS2/HTRA1, VEGFA, KDR, IL8, and SIRT1 genes were examined.

Results. The most reproducible associations with anti-VEGF response were found for CFH rs1061170 (Y402H), ARMS2 rs10490924, IL8 rs4073 (-251A/T) и VEGFA rs699947 polymorphisms. According to meta-analyses, carriage of the CFH rs1061170 risk allele is associated with reduced functional response (pooled OR=1.34, 95 % CI 1.10–1.63). However, the effect size is modest, results differ between European and Asian populations, and large RCTs have not confirmed the clinical utility of single SNPs. None of the studied markers possess sufficient predictive value for standalone use in routine practice.

Conclusion. Genetic markers associated with anti-VEGF therapy efficacy in nvAMD show moderate and heterogeneous effects. The development of polygenic prognostic models combining multiple SNPs with clinical and imaging parameters is a promising direction.

About the Authors

N. A. Bakunina
N. I. Pirogov city clinical hospital № 1; P. Lumumba Russian Peoples' Friendship University
Russian Federation

Natalya A. Bakunina — Dr. Sci. (Med.), ophthalmologist at the N. I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow Health Department, member of the All-Russian Glaucoma Society (Scientific Avant-garde), member of the European Glaucoma Society, Associate Professor, Department of Eye Diseases, Medical Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after P. Lumumba

Moscow



S. N. Tuchkova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; World-Class Genome Research Center «Center for Predictive Genetics, Pharmacogenetics, and Personalized Therapy», Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician B. V. Petrovsky
Russian Federation

Svetlana N. Tuchkova — Research Associate, Department of Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers, Research Institute of Molecular and Personalized Medicine, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Research Associate, Department of Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Therapy, Center for Predictive Genetics, Pharmacogenetics, and Personalized Therapy, a world-class genomic research center; B. V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Moscow



V. P. Matyukhin
N. I. Pirogov city clinical hospital № 1
Russian Federation

Vasily P. Matyukhin — ophthalmologist

Moscow



A. A. Anderganova
N. I. Pirogov city clinical hospital № 1
Russian Federation

Anastasia A. Anderzhanova — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Clinical Pharmacology Department

Moscow



M. A. Frolov
P. Lumumba Russian Peoples' Friendship University
Russian Federation

Michael A. Frolov — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Eye Diseases, Medical Institute

Moscow



References

1. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(2): e106-16. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1.

2. Dervenis N, Dervenis P, Agorogiannis E. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: disease pathogenesis and current state of molecular biomarkers predicting treatment response – a scoping review. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024;9(1): e001516. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001516.

3. Butler ETS, Arnold-Vangsted A, Schou MG, et al. Comparative efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review with network meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2025;103(7): 741-763. DOI: 10.1111/aos.17506.

4. Cheng S, Zhang S, Huang M, et al. Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs: progress from mechanisms to clinical applications. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1411278. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1411278.

5. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1432-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa062655.

6. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419-31. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa054481.

7. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Fine SL, et al; Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Research Group. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1388-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.053.

8. Broadhead GK, Hong T, Chang AA. Treating the untreatable patient: current options for the management of treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(8):713-23. DOI: 10.1111/aos.12463.

9. Bobadilla M, Pariente A, Oca AI, et al. Biomarkers as Predictive Factors of Anti-VEGF Response. Biomedicines. 2022;10(5):1003. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10051003.

10. Kozhevnikova OS, Fursova AZ, Derbeneva AS, et al. Association between Polymorphisms in CFH, ARMS2, CFI, and C3 Genes and Response to Anti-VEGF Treatment in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Biomedicines. 2022;10(7):1658. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071658.

11. Wang Z, Zou M, Chen A, et al. Genetic associations of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy response in age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100(3): e669-e680. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14970.

12. Hong N, Shen Y, Yu CY, et al. Association of the polymorphism Y402H in the CFH gene with response to anti-VEGF treatment in age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(4): 334-45. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13049.

13. Fritsche LG, Igl W, Bailey JN, et al. A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants. Nat Genet. 2016;48(2):134- 43. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3448.

14. Lorés-Motta L, Riaz M, Grunin M, et al. Association of Genetic Variants With Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(8):875-884. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2019.

15. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(4):581-611. DOI: 10.1210/er.2003-0027.

16. Apte RS, Chen DS, Ferrara N. VEGF in Signaling and Disease: Beyond Discovery and Development. Cell. 2019;176(6):1248-1264. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.021.

17. Yang Z, Camp NJ, Sun H, et al. A variant of the HTRA1 gene increases susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2006;314 (5801):992-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1133811.

18. Bakunina N.A., Shcherbo S.N., Kolesnikova L.N. The prognostic value of pharmacological and genetic testing in medical therapy of age-related macular degeneration. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2018;11(2):58-61. (In Russ.). Doi:10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-2-58-61

19. Bakunina NA. A method for choosing treatment tactics for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patent RUS №2707955. 02.12.2019. (In Russ.). Доступно по: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000224_000128_0002707955_20191202_C1_RU/?ysclid=mpvo4lhnw4279681719. Ссылка активна на 31.05.2026.

20. Bakunina NA. Improving the effectiveness of treatment of angle-closure glaucoma based on new concepts of the pathogenesis of the disease. [dissertation]. Moskow; 2023. (In Russ.). Доступно по: https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01011191262. Ссылка активна на 03.05.2026.

21. Heier JS, Khanani AM, Quezada Ruiz C, et al. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks (TENAYA and LUCERNE). Lancet. 2022;399(10326):729-740. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00010-1.

22. Penha FM, Masud M, Khanani ZA, et al. Review of real-world evidence of dual inhibition of VEGF-A and ANG-2 with faricimab. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024;10(1):5. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-024-00525-9.

23. Nguyen QD, Heier JS, Do DV, et al. The Tie2 signaling pathway in retinal vascular diseases: a novel therapeutic target in the eye. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2020; 6:48. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-020-00250-z.

24. Balikova I, Postelmans L, Pasteels B, et al. Genetic biomarkers in the VEGF pathway predicting response to anti-VEGF therapy in AMD. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019;4(1):e000273. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000273.

25. Dugel PU, Koh A, Ogura Y, et al. HAWK and HARRIER: Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked Trials of Brolucizumab. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(1):72-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.017.

26. Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet AMD. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2537-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.006.

27. Metrangolo C, Donati S, Mazzola M, et al. OCT Biomarkers in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Narrative Review. J Ophthalmol. 2021; 2021:9994098. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9994098.

28. Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, et al. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(20):7227-32. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501536102.

29. Anderson DH, Radeke MJ, Gallo NB, et al. The pivotal role of the complement system in aging and age-related macular degeneration: hypothesis re-visited. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29(2): 95-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.11.003.

30. Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S, et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308 (5720):419-21. DOI: 10.1126/science.1110359.

31. Edwards AO, Ritter R 3rd, Abel KJ, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308(5720):421- 4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1110189.

32. Laine M, Jarva H, Seitsonen S, et al. Y402H polymorphism of complement factor H affects binding affinity to C-reactive protein. J Immunol. 2007;178(6):3831-6. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.6.3831.

33. Lundh von Leithner P, KamJH,Bainbridge J, et al. Complement factor H is critical in the maintenance of retinal perfusion. Am J Pathol. 2009; 175(1):412-21. DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080927.

34. Brantley MA Jr, Fang AM, King JM, et al. Association of complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with response of exudative age-related macular degeneration to intravitreal bevacizumab. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):2168-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.008.

35. Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Barthelmes D, Labs S, et al. Genetic association with response to intravitreal ranibizumab in patients with neovascular AMD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4694-702. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6080.

36. Maugeri A, Barchitta M, Agodi A. The association between complement factor H rs1061170 polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive meta-analysis stratified by stage of disease and ethnicity. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(1): e8-e21. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13849.

37. Neto JM, Viturino MG, Ananina G, et al. Association of complement factor B, C3, and complement factor H variants with age-related macular degeneration in Brazilians. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021;246(21):2290-2296. DOI: 10.1177/15353702211024543.

38. Li M, Atmaca-Sonmez P, Othman M, et al. CFH haplotypes without the Y402H coding variant show strong association with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet. 2006;38(9):1049-54. DOI: 10.1038/ng1871.

39. Cebatoriene D, Vilkeviciute A, Gedvilaite G, et al. Complement factor H and KDR genetic variants and serum levels in age-related macular degeneration. Biomedicines. 2024;12(5):948. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12050948.

40. Cruz-Gonzalez F, Cabrillo-Estevez L, Rivero-Gutierrez V, et al. Influence of CFH, HTRA1 and ARMS2 polymorphisms in the response to ranibizumab in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(9): 1304-9. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.09.12.

41. Liao X, Lan CJ, Cheuk IW, Tan QQ. Four complement factor H gene polymorphisms in age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016; 64:123-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.01.011.

42. Yoneyama S, Sakurada Y, Kikushima W, et al. Genetic factors associated with response to aflibercept in typical age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):7188. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64301-z.

43. Park UC, Shin JY, Kim SJ, et al. Genetic factors associated with response to ranibizumab in Korean patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2014;34(2):288-97. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182979e1e.

44. Yamashiro K, Mori K, Honda S, et al. Genome-wide association study to identify genetic factors associated with ranibizumab response in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9196. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09632-0.

45. Park UC, Shin JY, Chung H, Yu HG. ARMS2 genotype and response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1): 241. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0631-z.

46. Abedi F, Wickremasinghe S, Richardson AJ, et al. Genetic influences on the outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(8):1641-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.014.

47. Zhou YL, Chen CL, Wang YX, et al. HTRA1 rs11200638 and response to anti-VEGF therapy in exudative AMD: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):97. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0487-2.

48. Cruz-Gonzalez F, Cabrillo-Estévez L, LópezValverde G, et al. Predictive value of VEGFA and VEGFR2 polymorphisms in the response to intravitreal ranibizumab for neovascular AMD. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(3): 469-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2585-7.

49. Park UC, Shin JY, McCarthy LC, et al. Pharmacogenetic associations with long-term response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in neovascular AMD patients. Mol Vis. 2014; 20:1680-94.

50. Veloso CE, de Almeida LN, Recchia FM, et al. VEGF gene polymorphism and response to intravitreal ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Res. 2014;51(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1159/000354328.

51. Hagstrom SA, Ying GS, Pauer GJ, et al. VEGFA and VEGFR2 polymorphisms and response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: the CATT study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(5): 521-7. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.109.

52. Wu M, Xiong H, Xu Y, et al. Association of VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 polymorphisms with response to anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(7):976-984. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309418.

53. Anderson DH, Mullins RF, Hageman GS, Johnson LV. A role for local inflammation in the formation of drusen in the aging eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(3):411-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01624-0.

54. Kauppinen A, Paterno JJ, Blasiak J, et al. Inflammation and its role in age-related macular degeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(9):1765- 86. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-016-2147-8.

55. Suzuki M, Kamei M, Itabe H, et al. Oxidized phospholipids in the macula increase with age and in age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 2007;13:772-8.

56. Heloterä H, Kaarniranta K. A Linkage between Angiogenesis and Inflammation in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Cells. 2022;11(21):3453. DOI: 10.3390/cells11213453.

57. Hildebrand F, Stuhrmann M, van Griensven M, et al. Association of IL-8-251A/T polymorphism with incidence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and IL-8 synthesis after multiple trauma. Cytokine. 2007;37(3):192-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.03.008.

58. Hautamäki A, Seitsonen S, Holopainen JM, Immonen I. IL-8 rs4073 A→T polymorphism associated with earlier age of onset of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(8):726-33. DOI: 10.1111/aos.12799.

59. Thomsen AK, Krogh Nielsen M, Liisborg C, Sørensen TL. Interleukin-8 -251 A/T polymorphism and treatment response in neovascular AMD. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:537-543. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S448794.

60. Lin Y, Li L, Liu J, et al. SIRT1 Deletion Impairs Retinal Endothelial Cell Migration Through Downregulation of VEGF-A/VEGFR-2 and MMP14. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(13): 5431-5440. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-23558.

61. Zhang H, He S, Spee C, et al. SIRT1 mediated inhibition of VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling by Resveratrol and its relevance to choroidal neovascularization. Cytokine. 2015;76(2):549-552. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.06.019.

62. Pan Q, Gao Z, Zhu C, et al. SIRT1 suppresses angiogenesis in endothelial cells by regulating miR-20a and YAP/HIF1α/VEGFA signaling. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020;319(5): E932-E943. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00051.2020.

63. Liutkeviciene R, Vilkeviciute A, Kriauciuniene L, et al. SIRT1, FGFR2, STAT3, LIPC, and LPL gene variants and age-related macular degeneration. Gene. 2019;686: 8-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.004.

64. Kaikaryte K, Gedvilaite G, Vilkeviciute A, et al. SIRT1: genetic variants and serum levels in age-related macular degeneration. Life (Basel). 2022;12(5):753. DOI: 10.3390/life12050753.

65. Velmurugan S, Pauline R, Chandrashekar G, et al. Impact of SIRT1 on age-related macular degeneration. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2024;31(2):93-101. DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_9_24.

66. Moshetova L.K., Abramova O.I., Turkina K.I., et al. Sirtuins and Their Role in the Aging Eye (Review). Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020;17(3):330-335. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3-330-335

67. Agosta E, Lazzeri S, Orlandi P, et al. Pharmacogenetics of antiangiogenic and antineovascular therapies of age-related macular degeneration. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13(9):1037-53. DOI: 10.2217/pgs.12.77.

68. Dedania VS, Grob S, Zhang K, Bakri SJ. Pharmacogenomics of response to anti-VEGF therapy in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2015;35(3):381-91. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000466.

69. Fauser S, Lambrou GN. Genetic predictive biomarkers of anti-VEGF treatment response in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(2):138-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.11.002.

70. Strunz T, Pöllmann M, Gamulescu MA, et al. Genetic Association Analysis of Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23 (11):6094. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23116094.

71. Guymer RH, Silva R, Ghadessi M, et al. ANO2 Genetic Variants and Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Neovascular AMD: A Pharmacogenetic Substudy of VIEW 1 and VIEW 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024;65(8):17. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.8.17.

72. Budzinskaia MV, Pogoda TV, Generozov EV, et al. Contemporary pharmacogenetic approachesto the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2013;129(5):127 135. (InRuss.).


Review

For citations:


Bakunina N.A., Tuchkova S.N., Matyukhin V.P., Anderganova A.A., Frolov M.A. Genetic markers of the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in age-related macular degeneration. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2026;(2):54-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-0011. EDN: ODYTQW

Views: 15

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0527 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8849 (Online)