Scroll to:
Improving the quality of Russian pharmacogenetic research through the implementation of international standards: the role of the STROPS guideline
https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2025-4-3-9
EDN: DBPOFO
Abstract
This article addresses the improvement of the quality of Russian pharmacogenetic studies through the adoption of the international reporting guideline STROPS (STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies). In the context of the active implementation of pharmacogenetic technologies in clinical practice in Russia, the authors emphasize the need to ensure transparency, reproducibility and legal correctness of published pharmacogenetic studies as an evidence base for pharmacogenetics. We propose an adapted STROPS-based checklist tailored to Russian regulatory requirements, including ethical approval, genotyping methods, and restrictions on genetic data transfer. The Russian journal "Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics" plans to implement these standards in its review process starting in 2026. We believe the adoption of STROPS represents a crucial step toward enhancing scientific rigor and international recognition of Russian pharmacogenetic research.
Keywords
For citations:
Sychev D.A., Mirzaev K.B., Nadelyaeva I.I., Kotenko K.V. Improving the quality of Russian pharmacogenetic research through the implementation of international standards: the role of the STROPS guideline. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2025;(4):3-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2025-4-3-9. EDN: DBPOFO
Introduction
Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics have become an integral part of personalized medicine, allowing therapy to be optimized based on a patient's genetic characteristics. However, the value of such pharmacogenetic studies directly depends on the quality of their conduct and, equally importantly, on the completeness and transparency of their description in publications. In international practice, specialized guidelines such as STROPS (Strengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies) are used to ensure a high level of such publications, serving as the evidence base for implementing pharmacogenetics into clinical practice [1].
In Russia, interest in pharmacogenetics is growing, as is the number of publications in this field. However, many studies still suffer from insufficient detail in methods, incomplete description of genetic data, lack of information on the quality of genotyping, and a lack of awareness regarding ethical and legal aspects of working with participants' genetic information. In light of upcoming changes in the Russian Federation legislation aimed at strengthening control over the handling of genetic data (Federal Law No. 86-FZ), the issue of correctly and completely describing pharmacogenetic studies becomes particularly relevant [2]. The new legal regulations require clear rules for the collection, storage, processing, and transfer of pharmacogenetic information, which should also be reflected in scientific publications.
The purpose of this article is to introduce Russian researchers to the STROPS guideline, explain its importance for improving the quality of publications, and propose adapted criteria that can be used in deciding on the publication of pharmacogenetic study results, taking into account Russian legal norms.
What is STROPS and why do we need it?
STROPS is an extension of the well-known STROBE (for observational studies) and STREGA (for genetic association studies) guidelines, specifically developed for pharmacogenetic studies [3, 4]. It contains 54 items covering all parts of a study: from rationale and design to interpretation of results and ethical aspects [1].
Implementing STROPS allows for:
increasing the transparency and reproducibility of pharmacogenetic studies;
reducing the risk of selective reporting (where only "positive" results are published);
ensuring comparability of data across different studies;
strengthening confidence in the results from the scientific community, regulators, and clinicians;
facilitating the integration of data into international databases (such as ClinPGx, formerly known as PharmGKB), meta-analyses, and systematic reviews.
For Russian scientists, following STROPS is not only a step towards improving the quality of publications but also an opportunity to increase their visibility and citation in the international arena.
Adapted STROPS Criteria for Russian Researchers Considering Legislative Changes. Based on the STROPS guideline and considering the specifics of Russian legislation (in particular, the draft amendments to Federal Law No. 86-FZ), key points that should be given special attention when preparing publications are proposed (see table).
Recommendations for Authors Publishing in the Journal "Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics".
Starting in 2026, the journal "Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics" will introduce the STROPS guideline, in a version adapted for the Russian Federation, as the recommended reporting standard. When submitting manuscripts, authors will be asked to complete a checklist for compliance with key STROPS items, paying special attention to sections related to:
Ethical approval and informed consent.
Genotyping methods and quality control.
Legal aspects of handling genetic data, especially concerning population studies and possible data transfer.
The journal's editorial office will provide consultative support to authors on applying these standards.
Conclusion
Thus, the introduction of the STROPS publication standards for pharmacogenetic studies into Russian research practice is not a formality, but a necessary condition for enhancing the scientific rigor, legal correctness, and international recognition of domestic pharmacogenetic research. The upcoming changes in the legislation of the Russian Federation create a new framework for working with genetic data, making methodological transparency and compliance with ethical and legal norms not merely the good will of the researcher, but a mandatory requirement. The STROPS guideline, adapted to Russian specifics, can become a practical tool helping scientists not only to improve the quality of publications but also to design their studies in accordance with the legal framework in advance.
The journal "Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics" is ready to serve as a platform for implementing these standards and contribute to the formation of a culture of high-quality, reproducible, and ethically responsible pharmacogenetic science in Russia.
Table
Checklist for assessing the appropriateness of publication of pharmacogenetic study results based on the STROPS guidelines
| Section of Publication | Compliance Criteria | Commentary | Compliant: Yes / No / Not Applicable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured summary | Sections highlighted: relevance, study objective, materials and methods, results, conclusions / summary | |
| The results section indicates the "magnitude" of the pharmacogenetic effect | Odds ratios / risk ratios, confidence intervals, p-values are stated | ||
| Keywords | Including the keywords: pharmacogenetics and/or pharmacogenomics | ||
| Introduction / Background | An analysis of previously published results of pharmacogenetic studies (on the disease, on the drug or drug group) is conducted, indicating search keywords | A search was conducted in international databases (e.g., PubMed and others) | |
| The selection of candidate genes and polymorphisms studied in the research is justified | A search was conducted for domestic studies in Russian databases (e.g., eLibrary.ru and others) | ||
| The study objective is clearly formulated | References are provided to "functional" studies explaining the possible role of the gene product in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the drug. References are given to studies on the frequency of the studied polymorphisms, including in the Russian population (if data are available for various ethnic groups of the Russian Federation) | ||
| The type and design of the study (cohort, case-control, etc.) are indicated | This should state whether the study is "associative" or prospective ("clinical validation"¹ of an algorithm/model for personalizing pharmacotherapy based on pharmacogenetic testing) | ||
| Materials and Methods | The study design is described, indicating the method of forming patient groups² | The method of forming patient groups is indicated | |
| The estimated sample size calculation is provided | Outcomes (including measurable efficacy and safety criteria) are specified | ||
| The medical organization or clinical department where patient enrollment took place is named | If patients were enrolled based at a partner medical organization of the research center, the existence of a valid agreement must be indicated | ||
| Patient inclusion/exclusion criteria are described | Verification of the nosology must be carried out in accordance with current Russian clinical guidelines published in the Ministry of Health's clinical guidelines rubricator https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru | ||
| Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients included in the study are provided | It is recommended to present this in a table, including information on concomitant diseases and concomitant drug therapy | ||
| Information on participants' self-identified racial and ethnic background is provided | The method for verifying racial and ethnic background (e.g., self-identification by both parents) should be provided | ||
| Information on the absence or presence of familial relationships among study participants is provided | First and second-degree relationships are considered | ||
| Information is provided on all drugs used and their dosage regimens | Drug use complies with the instructions for medical use from the State Register of Medicines (GRLS)³ | ||
| Drug use complies with current clinical guidelines published in the Ministry of Health's clinical guidelines rubricator https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru | |||
| Methods for monitoring patient adherence to drug therapy (if used) are specified | |||
| The algorithm for personalizing pharmacotherapy based on pharmacogenetic testing is provided | Applicable for prospective studies ("clinical validation" of an algorithm/model for personalizing pharmacotherapy based on pharmacogenetic testing) | ||
| The studied genetic variants are indicated⁴ | Genetic variants are indicated by rs numbers | ||
| It is specified which allelic variants are "minor" and which are "wild-type" | |||
| Genetic Analysis | Methods of biomaterial collection, storage conditions, and DNA extraction are described | ||
| The PCR or sequencing method, equipment, and reagents are described | |||
| The quality control method for genetic studies is indicated | |||
| The laboratory where the study was conducted is named | |||
| Statistical Analysis | Should reflect the use of corrections for multiple comparisons and a description of bioinformatic processing (when using sequencing) | ||
| Ethical Review and Legal Aspects | Information about participants or their legal representatives signing informed consent must be provided | For studies involving minor patients over 15 years of age, informed consent must be signed by the patient and their legal representative | |
| The date and protocol number of the Ethics Committee that issued approval must be provided | The protocol must reflect the Ethics Committee's approval for the collection and use of genetic data | ||
| If using biomaterials from a biobank collection, indicate the existence of broad consent for use⁵ | |||
| It must be stated that genetic data and biomaterial are not transferred outside the Russian Federation | Except for cases provided for by law, which must be specified | ||
| The study is registered on the Unified Pharmacogenomic Platform⁶ | The registration number of the study must be provided | ||
| Results | The distribution of identified genotypes is checked for compliance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium | In case of deviation, the deviations must be explained | |
| Study limitations are presented | Possible sources of bias, including insufficient power, must be indicated | ||
| Funding | Sources of funding for the entire study or parts of the study are presented | The source of funding and the sponsor's role in study design, data collection, analysis, and publication (if any) must be indicated | |
| The presence / absence of a conflict of interest is stated | |||
| Discussion | A discussion is presented in comparison with similar foreign and domestic studies, prospects for further research, and the practical significance of the results |
⁵ Broad consent — the consent of a participant/patient for the repeated use of personal data and biomaterials in different studies, subject to confidentiality conditions.
⁶ Currently, the functionality of the Register of Domestic Pharmacogenetic Studies is being developed on the Unified Pharmacogenomic Platform, developed at the World-Class Genomic Research Center "Center for Predictive Genetics, Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Therapy" of the B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Ministry of Education and Science of Russia.
References
1. Chaplin M, Kirkham JJ, Dwan K, et al. STrengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies: Development of the STROPS guideline. PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 21;17(9):e1003344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003344.
2. Законопроект № 1069497-8 О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон «О государственном регулировании в области генно-инженерной деятельности». (в части обеспечения сохранности и защиты генетических данных человека, а также создания механизмов контроля за обращением таких генетических данных). URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1069497-8 [Bill No. 1069497-8 On Amendments to the Federal Law «On State Regulation in the Field of Genetic Engineering Activities» (regarding ensuring the safety and protection of human genetic data, as well as the creation of mechanisms to control the circulation of such genetic data). (In Russ.)].
3. Jorgensen AL, Williamson PR. Methodological quality of pharmacogenetic studies: issues of concern. Stat Med. 2008 Dec 30;27(30):6547-69. doi: 10.1002/sim.3420.
4. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
5. Сычев Д.А., Иващенко Д.В., Мирзаев К.Б. Методология проведения клинических исследований в области персонализированной медицины: фокус на фармакогенетику. Вестник Росздравнадзора. 2018;2:40-47. [Sychev D.A., Ivaschenko D.V., Mirzaev K.B. Methodology of conducting clinical trials in the field of personalized medicine: focus on pharmacogenetics. Bulletin of Roszdravnadzor. 2018;2:40-47 (In Russ.)].
About the Authors
D. A. SychevRussian Federation
Dmitry A. Sychev — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, scientific supervisor; Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy named after B.E. Votchal
K. B. Mirzaev
Russian Federation
Karin B. Mirzaev — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Deputy Head Professor of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy named after B.E. Votchal
I. I. Nadelyaeva
Russian Federation
Irina I. Nadelyaeva — Head of Research and Development Research Department
K. V. Kotenko
Russian Federation
Konstantin V. Kotenko — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director
What is already known about this topic?
Importance of Pharmacogenetics: Pharmacogenetics is a crucial part of personalized medicine, allowing therapy to be optimized based on a patient's genetics.
Existence of STROPS: An international reporting guideline called STROPS (Strengthening the Reporting Of Pharmacogenetic Studies) already exists. It contains 54 items designed to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and completeness in pharmacogenetic research publications.
Quality Issues in Russia: Despite growing interest and an increasing number of publications in Russia, local studies often suffer from poor methodological detail, incomplete genetic data reporting, and a lack of attention to ethical and legal aspects of handling genetic data.
What is new in the article?
Adaptation for Russia: The authors propose a novel, adapted version of the STROPS checklist specifically tailored to the Russian regulatory and legal environment.
Integration of New Legislation: The checklist incorporates new requirements from upcoming changes in Russian legislation (Federal Law No. 86-FZ), which strictly regulates the collection, storage, and transfer of genetic data.
Journal Implementation: The article announces that the Russian journal "Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics" will mandate this adapted STROPS standard for all submissions starting in 2026, including a requirement for authors to submit a completed compliance checklist.
Practical Tool: It provides a detailed, bilingual (Russian/English) table that serves as a practical guide for researchers to ensure their manuscripts meet both international scientific and local legal standards before submission.
How can this affect clinical practice in the foreseeable future?
More Reliable Evidence Base: By enforcing stricter reporting standards, the quality of published Russian pharmacogenetic research will improve. This creates a more reliable evidence base for doctors to confidently use pharmacogenetic tests in their clinical decision-making.
Legally Compliant Integration: The focus on legal aspects (informed consent, data transfer bans, ethics approval) ensures that as pharmacogenetic testing moves into clinics, it will be done in a manner compliant with Russian law, protecting both patients and practitioners.
Development of Local Guidelines: Higher quality data will facilitate the creation of robust, evidence-based Russian clinical guidelines for pharmacogenetic testing, moving away from reliance solely on international data.
Review
For citations:
Sychev D.A., Mirzaev K.B., Nadelyaeva I.I., Kotenko K.V. Improving the quality of Russian pharmacogenetic research through the implementation of international standards: the role of the STROPS guideline. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2025;(4):3-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2025-4-3-9. EDN: DBPOFO
JATS XML




































