Preview

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics

Advanced search

Pharmacogenetic aspects of drug interactions in stroke patients (using the CYP2C9 gene as an example)

https://doi.org/10.37489/2686-8849-0015

EDN: XAJHII

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

Relevance. The safety of stroke pharmacotherapy against the background of polypharmacy is of paramount importance in modern clinical practice. Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 genes, including the CYP2C9 gene, significantly contribute to drug responses and drug-drug interactions. The alleles with reduced function are CYP2C9*2 (R144C, rs1799853) and CYP2C9*3 (I359L, rs1057910).

Objective. Analysis of the frequency distribution of alleles and genotypes of the CYP2C9 gene (rs1057910, rs1799853) in stroke patients, taking into account possible drug interactions in real clinical practice in Arkhangelsk.

Materials and methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of patients diagnosed with stroke, hospitalized in the neurology department of the regional vascular center of the First City Clinical Hospital named after E. E. Volosevich of the Arkhangelsk Region. Patients were divided into two groups: those initially hospitalized and those readmitted. Polymorphic variants of the CYP2C9 gene were studied: rs1057910 (Ile359Leu), rs1799853 (Arg144Cys) by real-time polymerase chain reaction using a Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch amplifier.

Results. The study included 81 patients aged 43 to 95 years with a diagnosed stroke. Statistically significant differences were observed in the blood potassium level of 4.2 (3,865–4,615) in the group with primary hospitalization and 4,575 (4.31–4,845) in the group with repeated hospitalization (р=0,022). Carriers of low-functional variants of the CYP2C9 gene were identified in both groups: Ile359Leu (rs1057910), Arg144Cys (rs1799853). Statistically significant differences between the CYP2C9 gene allele variants and the frequency of repeated hospitalizations are not detected (p>0.05). The analysis of pharmacotherapy in the study sample of post-stroke patients revealed potential undesirable drug interactions between clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid as a risk factor for side effects.

Conclusion. The study conducted in real clinical practice demonstrates the importance of introducing pharmacogenetic testing in stroke patients from the perspective of identifying potential drug interactions.

For citations:


Vorobyeva N.A., Sharapova S.A., Vorontsova A.S., Kharkova O.A. Pharmacogenetic aspects of drug interactions in stroke patients (using the CYP2C9 gene as an example). Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2026;(2):106-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2686-8849-0015. EDN: XAJHII

Introduction
Modern medicine faces a steady increase in the use of drugs, the expansion of pharmacological possibilities, and the growing number of patients receiving multicomponent pharmacotherapy. Given these circumstances, the issue of rationality and safety of pharmacotherapy becomes paramount [1]. The individual response to administered drugs is largely determined by genetic factors. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of each drug depend on polymorphisms of specific genes [2]. It is known that cytochrome P450 isoenzymes participate in phase I biotransformation reactions, among which the CYP2C9 gene makes a significant contribution [3]. The CYP2C9 gene is highly polymorphic. According to numerous studies, the most common CYP2C9 alleles are CYP2C9*2 (R144C, rs1799853) and CYP2C9*3 (I359L, rs1057910). The presence of these alleles leads to reduced function of the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme [4]. Currently, it is known that the frequencies of these polymorphisms vary across populations. According to research data, the reduced‑function allele CYP2C9*2 is most frequent in European (13%) and Latin American populations (8%), as well as among Central/South Asian (11%) and Middle Eastern (13%) populations. The CYP2C9*3 allele is most frequent in Central/South Asia (11%), Europe (7.6%), and the Middle East (8.3%) [5].

It has been established that individuals with altered enzyme activity show substantial fluctuations in plasma drug concentrations [1]. Thus, genetic polymorphism not only affects the individual pharmacological response to a particular drug but can also lead to unfavorable drug–drug interactions. Among the negative consequences of drug interactions, the most significant are the development of adverse reactions, reduced efficacy of pharmacotherapy, increased frequency and duration of hospitalizations, and increased mortality [6].

Today, stroke remains one of the leading causes of mortality, disability, and long‑term incapacity worldwide [7]. Pharmacotherapy is an important component of the comprehensive treatment of post‑stroke patients, and the lack of an individualized approach to its selection may lead to severe complications [8].

Objective
Analysis of the frequency distribution of alleles and genotypes of the CYP2C9 gene (rs1057910, rs1799853) in stroke patients, taking into account possible drug interactions in real clinical practice in Arkhangelsk.

Materials and methods
A cross‑sectional study was conducted on a sample of patients diagnosed with stroke, hospitalized in the neurology department of the regional vascular center of the First City Clinical Hospital named after E.E. Volosevich of the Arkhangelsk Region. The work was carried out at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy of the Northern State Medical University and the Regional Center for Antithrombotic Therapy of the First City Clinical Hospital named after E.E. Volosevich in Arkhangelsk. The study design was approved by the local ethics committee of the Northern State Medical University (meeting protocol No. 10/12‑25 dated 24.12.2025).

The study included 81 patients. Inclusion criteria: patients of both sexes hospitalized in the neurology department of the regional vascular center of the First City Clinical Hospital named after E.E. Volosevich; age over 18 years; diagnosis of stroke (ICD‑10: I60.2, I63.3, I61.4, I63.8, I63.9, I63.4, I61.0, I60.1, I63.5); voluntary written informed consent to participate in the study.

Non‑inclusion criteria: absence of clinical diagnosis of stroke (ICD‑10 codes as above); absence of voluntary written informed consent; age under 18 years.

Exclusion criteria: withdrawal of consent at any stage of the study.

The fact of drug intake was established based on electronic medical records. Drug–drug interactions were assessed using the available platform https://mediqlab.com. In accordance with clinical guidelines, laboratory tests were performed: complete blood count (Mindray Bc5380 hematology analyzer), biochemical blood test (ILab Taurus biochemical analyzer), coagulogram (Sysmex CS2000i automatic coagulometer).

All study participants underwent molecular genetic analysis to determine the frequency of genotypes and alleles of the CYP2C9 gene, followed by analysis of possible drug–drug interactions. DNA was extracted from venous blood collected in Acti‑Fine tubes with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid using the RealBest‑Genetics DNA‑Express reagent kits. Genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphic allelic variants of the CYP2C9 gene was performed by real‑time polymerase chain reaction on a Bio‑Rad CFX96 Touch amplifier using SNP‑Screen reagent kits (Sintol LLC, Russian Federation) at the centralized bacteriological laboratory of the First City Clinical Hospital named after E.E. Volosevich. The polymorphic variants rs1057910 (Ile359Leu) and rs1799853 (Arg144Cys) of the CYP2C9 gene were studied. The laboratory performing the study participates in external quality assessment. The conformity of allele frequencies in the studied groups to the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was tested using the available online calculator https://converterok.com/calculator/hardy‑weinberg‑calculator/.

Statistical analysis of the data obtained was performed using STATA 2014. Qualitative data were described using absolute numbers and percentages. The normality of the distribution of quantitative data was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A distribution was considered different from normal if the statistical significance level (p) was less than 0.05. Data with non‑normal distribution are presented as median and first and third quartiles (Me (Q1–Q3)). Categorical variables were compared using the χ² test (Pearson's chi‑square test). Comparisons of means were performed using the Mann–Whitney test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a significance level (p) less than 0.05.

Primary genetic data were not and will not be transferred outside the Russian Federation in accordance with Federal Law No. 86‑FZ.

Results
The study included 81 patients aged 43 to 95 years with a diagnosed stroke, of whom 40 were women (49.38%) and 41 were men (50.62%). Patients were divided into two groups: those initially hospitalized for stroke and those readmitted with recurrent stroke. The primary hospitalization group (age Me = 70 (65–80)) consisted of 29 men (44.62%) and 36 women (55.38%). The recurrent stroke group (age Me = 73 (63–83)) comprised 12 men (75%) and 4 women (25%).

The main clinical and laboratory parameters are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The groups did not differ statistically in comorbidities and risk factors (Table 1). Analysis of laboratory blood parameters revealed no statistically significant differences except for potassium level (p = 0.022) (Table 2). In the primary hospitalization group, blood potassium was 4.2 (3.865–4.615), while in the readmission group it was 4.575 (4.31–4.845).

Table 1. Characteristics of patients included in the study

ParameterPatients without readmission (n=65)Patients with readmission (n=16)χ², p
High‑risk pulmonary embolism, n (%)13 (20%)4 (25%)χ² = 0.1936, p = 0.660
Arterial hypertension, n (%)64 (98.46%)16 (100%)χ² = 0.2492, p = 0.618
Ischemic heart disease, n (%)41 (63.08%)11 (68.75%)χ² = 0.1798, p = 0.672
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)20 (30.77%)4 (25%)χ² = 0.2050, p = 0.651
Cardiac arrhythmias, n (%)29 (44.62%)5 (31.25%)χ² = 0.9417, p = 0.332
Atherosclerosis, n (%)58 (89.23%)16 (100%)χ² = 1.8861, p = 0.170
Chronic kidney disease, n (%)11 (16.92%)2 (12.5%)χ² = 0.1864, p = 0.666
Obesity, n (%)2 (3.08%)1 (6.25%)χ² = 0.3625, p = 0.547
Smoking, n (%)8 (12.31%)1 (6.25%)χ² = 0.4770, p = 0.490
Alcohol abuse, n (%)4 (6.15%)2 (12.5%)χ² = 0.7539, p = 0.385

Table 2. Analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters

ParameterPatients without readmission (n=65)Patients with readmission (n=16)z, p
Systolic blood pressure (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmHg140 (140–170)155 (140–160)z = –0.711, p = 0.477
Diastolic blood pressure (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmHg90 (80–90)90 (90–90)z = –1.382, p = 0.167
Heart rate (Me (Q1–Q3)), bpm80 (73–80)80 (75.5–80)z = –0.061, p = 0.951
Hemoglobin (Me (Q1–Q3)), g/L135.5 (122–145)133.5 (113.5–149.5)z = 0.168, p = 0.866
Platelets (Me (Q1–Q3)), 10⁹/L201.5 (170.5–249)204 (160–246.5)z = –0.247, p = 0.805
Prothrombin time (Me (Q1–Q3)), s10.8 (10–11.4)10.75 (10.25–11.3)z = 0.038, p = 0.970
INR (Me (Q1–Q3))1.02 (0.98–1.12)1.025 (0.99–1.14)z = –0.214, p = 0.831
APTT (Me (Q1–Q3)), s33.2 (28.2–36.4)33.95 (29.1–35.95)z = –0.329, p = 0.742
Fibrinogen (Me (Q1–Q3)), g/L3.25 (2.65–4.02)3.165 (2.715–4.05)z = –0.019, p = 0.985
Creatinine (Me (Q1–Q3)), µmol/L91 (79.5–109.5)107 (89.5–114)z = –1.865, p = 0.062
Urea (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmol/L6.665 (5.35–8.515)7.205 (5.595–9.29)z = –0.752, p = 0.452
ALT (Me (Q1–Q3)), U/L17 (13–28)17 (14–25)z = –0.061, p = 0.951
AST (Me (Q1–Q3)), U/L26 (22–30)25 (21–36.5)z = 0.061, p = 0.951
Total bilirubin (Me (Q1–Q3)), µmol/L13 (8.7–19.9)12.5 (8.95–17.65)z = 0.402, p = 0.688
Cholesterol (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmol/L5.32 (4.18–6.36)5.585 (4.335–6.885)z = –0.685, p = 0.493
Triglycerides (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmol/L1.44 (0.91–2.1)1.47 (0.87–1.64)z = 0.767, p = 0.443
LDL (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmol/L3.41 (2.42–4.41)3.415 (2.365–4.68)z = 0.167, p = 0.868
HDL (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmol/L1.18 (1.03–1.43)1.25 (1.07–1.53)z = –0.757, p = 0.449
Sodium (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmol/L140.35 (137.55–142.5)140.6 (139.75–141.9)z = –0.301, p = 0.764
Potassium (Me (Q1–Q3)), mmol/L4.2 (3.865–4.615)4.575 (4.31–4.845)z = –2.298, p = 0.022

Notes: Me — median; Q1 — first quartile; Q3 — third quartile; INR — international normalized ratio; APTT — activated partial thromboplastin time; ALT — alanine aminotransferase; AST — aspartate aminotransferase; LDL — low‑density lipoprotein; HDL — high‑density lipoprotein.

In this study, we analyzed the distribution of genotypes at positions Ile359Leu (rs1057910) and Arg144Cys (rs1799853) of the CYP2C9 gene in patients hospitalized for the first time and those readmitted. The genotype distribution at the polymorphic locus Ile359Leu (rs1057910) of the CYP2C9 gene in both the primary hospitalization and readmission groups was consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (at p = 0.05, χ² = 2.6214 and χ² = 0.1712, respectively). Similarly, the genotype distribution at the polymorphic locus Arg144Cys (rs1799853) of the CYP2C9 gene in both groups conformed to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (at p = 0.05, χ² = 0.6722 and χ² = 0.3265, respectively).

Both the CYP2C9 Ile359Leu (rs1057910) and Arg144Cys (rs1799853) polymorphism analyses showed that the majority of patients in both groups carried the homozygous wild‑type allele. Carriers of reduced‑function variants Ile359Leu (rs1057910) and Arg144Cys (rs1799853) of CYP2C9, corresponding to poor metabolizers, were found in both groups. Notably, the homozygous mutant allele at Ile359Leu (rs1057910) was observed only in the primary hospitalization group, while no homozygous mutant allele at Arg144Cys (rs1799853) was detected in either group. Analysis of the frequency of reduced‑function alleles of the studied single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CYP2C9 gene revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3. Comparative analysis of the frequencies of CYP2C9 polymorphism genotypes in patients hospitalized for the first time and hospitalized again

Genotype / alleleFrequency among first‑time hospitalized patients (n=65)Frequency among readmitted patients (n=16)χ², p
Ile359Leu CYP2C9 (rs1057910)   
A/A89.23% (n=58)81.25% (n=13)χ² = 1.3866, p = 0.500
A/C9.23% (n=6)18.75% (n=3) 
C/C1.54% (n=1)0% (n=0) 
A93.85% (n=122)90.625% (n=29) 
C6.15% (n=6)9.375% (n=3) 
Arg144Cys CYP2C9 (rs1799853)   
C/C81.54% (n=53)75% (n=12)χ² = 0.3463, p = 0.556
C/T18.46% (n=12)25% (n=4) 
T/T0% (n=0)0% (n=0) 
C90.77% (n=118)87.50% (n=28) 
T9.23% (n=12)12.50% (n=4) 

We further analyzed the combinations of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel (a substrate of CYP2C9) with other drugs that could potentially affect the ongoing pharmacotherapy through drug–drug interactions. The most common combinations were: clopidogrel with atorvastatin (32.10%), clopidogrel with omeprazole (32.10%), acetylsalicylic acid with omeprazole (81.48%), acetylsalicylic acid with bisoprolol (59.26%), and acetylsalicylic acid with perindopril (48.15%) (Table 4).

Table 4. Pharmacotherapy considering possible drug–drug interactions in hospitalized patients with stroke

Drug combinationWithout readmission (n=65)With readmission (n=16)χ², p
Clopidogrel + Atorvastatin (n=26)21 (32.31%)5 (31.25%)χ² = 0.0066, p = 0.935
Clopidogrel + Omeprazole (n=26)21 (32.31%)5 (31.25%)χ² = 0.0066, p = 0.935
Acetylsalicylic acid + Omeprazole (n=66)52 (80%)14 (87.5%)χ² = 0.4786, p = 0.489
Acetylsalicylic acid + Bisoprolol (n=48)39 (60.0%)9 (56.25%)χ² = 0.0748, p = 0.784
Acetylsalicylic acid + Perindopril (n=39)29 (44.62%)10 (62.50%)χ² = 1.6450, p = 0.200
Acetylsalicylic acid + Clopidogrel (n=24)19 (29.23%)5 (31.25%)χ² = 0.0251, p = 0.874
Acetylsalicylic acid + Spironolactone (n=15)13 (20.0%)2 (12.50%)χ² = 0.4786, p = 0.489
Acetylsalicylic acid + Amlodipine (n=20)16 (24.62%)4 (25.0%)χ² = 0.0010, p = 0.975

Additionally, we analyzed the relationship between CYP2C9 genotypes and the frequency of readmissions during stroke pharmacotherapy. No statistically significant differences were found between CYP2C9 allele variants and the frequency of readmissions (p > 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5. Relationship of CYP2C9 gene genotypes with the frequency of repeated hospitalizations during stroke pharmacotherapy

Drug combination

Primary hospitalization (n=65)

Repeated hospitalization (n=16)

χ2, р

 

Ile359Leu CYP2C9 (rs1057910)

 

A/A

A/C

C/C

A/A

A/C

C/C

Clopidogrel + Atorvastatin (n=26)

18

3

0

4

1

0

χ2 =0,1013

р=0,750

Clopidogrel + Omeprazole (n=26)

18

3

0

4

1

0

χ2 =0,1013

р=0,750

Acetylsalicylic acid + Omeprazole (n=66)

45

6

1

11

3

0

χ2 =1,1430

р=0,565

Acetylsalicylic acid + Bisoprolol (n=48)

34

4

1

8

1

0

χ2 =0,2383

р=0,888

Acetylsalicylic acid + Perindopril (n=39)

24

5

0

8

2

0

χ2 =0,0384

р=0,845

Acetylsalicylic acid + Clopidogrel (n=24)

16

3

0

4

1

0

χ2 =0,0505

р=0,822

Acetylsalicylic acid + Spironolactone (n=15)

13

0

0

1

1

0

χ2 =6,9643

р=0,008

Acetylsalicylic acid + Amlodipine (n=20)

15

1

0

4

0

0

χ2 =0,2632

р=0,608

 

Arg144Cys CYP2C9 (rs1799853)

 

C/C

C/T

T/T

C/C

C/T

T/T

Clopidogrel + Atorvastatin (n=26)

17

4

0

4

1

0

χ2 =0,0024

р=0,961

Clopidogrel + Omeprazole (n=26)

17

4

0

3

2

0

χ2 =0,9987

р=0,318

Acetylsalicylic acid + Omeprazole (n=66)

44

8

0

10

4

0

χ2 =1,2894

р=0,256

Acetylsalicylic acid + Bisoprolol (n=48)

34

5

0

7

2

0

χ2 =0,5189

р=0,471

Acetylsalicylic acid + Perindopril (n=39)

22

7

0

7

3

0

χ2 =0,1340

р=0,714

Acetylsalicylic acid + Clopidogrel (n=24)

15

4

0

3

2

0

χ2 =0,7579

р=0,384

Acetylsalicylic acid + Spironolactone (n=15)

12

1

0

1

1

0

χ2 =2,6849

р=0,101

Acetylsalicylic acid + Amlodipine (n=20)

11

5

0

3

1

0

χ2 =0,0595

р=0,807

Discussion
Polypharmacy is a significant risk factor for adverse drug reactions resulting from drug interactions [9]. Complex treatment regimens used for patients with cardiovascular diseases significantly increase the likelihood of dangerous drug interactions [10]. The analysis of pharmacotherapy in the study sample of post‑stroke patients revealed potential undesirable drug–drug interactions between clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid.

Co‑administration of atorvastatin and clopidogrel may reduce the conversion of the prodrug clopidogrel to its active form, thereby suppressing its antiplatelet effects. Combination of clopidogrel with acetylsalicylic acid leads to enhanced inhibition of platelet aggregation, increasing the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding [11]. Concurrent use of clopidogrel or acetylsalicylic acid with proton pump inhibitors, such as omeprazole, may reduce their antiplatelet effect [12]. Co‑administration of acetylsalicylic acid with perindopril may reduce the antihypertensive effect of the ACE inhibitor [13]. Simultaneous use of acetylsalicylic acid with bisoprolol may reduce the hypotensive effect of the beta‑blocker [14].

In our study, we identified carriers of the reduced‑function alleles CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 in the patient sample, with frequencies of 19.75% and 12.34%, respectively, which significantly exceeds the data from a study on the prevalence of these alleles among Korean stroke patients, where the carrier frequency of CYP2C9*3 was only 4%, and carriers of CYP2C9*2 were not detected at all [15]. These differences in results may be due to population genetic characteristics, analytical methods, or ethnic background of participants.

The mutant allele frequencies of CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 in our study were 9.9% and 6.8%, respectively. These values are comparable with data published for the Russian population. According to available genetic studies, the frequencies of CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 alleles in the Russian population reach approximately 11% and 5.8%, respectively [16].

Our study did not confirm the hypothesis that carriage of reduced‑function CYP2C9 alleles (rs1057910 and rs1799853) affects the frequency of readmissions, which may be due to insufficient sample size.

Study limitations
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results:

  1. The study included 81 patients, which limits the statistical power of the analysis, especially when assessing rare allelic variants.

  2. The study sample consisted of patients from a single northern region, which limits the extrapolation of data to other regions of Russia or ethnic groups.

  3. Other potentially important genetic factors (e.g., epigenetic influences, polymorphisms of other genes) were not taken into account.

To overcome these limitations, it is advisable to: increase the sample size, especially for rare genotypes; consider additional genetic factors affecting treatment efficacy; conduct multicenter studies to improve data representativeness.

Conclusion
In this study, carriers of reduced‑function variants Ile359Leu (rs1057910) and Arg144Cys (rs1799853) of CYP2C9 were identified among patients in the study sample. Although the study did not reveal a statistically significant association between the presence of reduced‑function CYP2C9 alleles and the frequency of readmissions, it demonstrates the importance of implementing pharmacogenetic testing in stroke patients receiving pharmacotherapy.

In conclusion, it should be noted that genetic allelic variants of the CYP2C9 gene, which cause variability in response to pharmacotherapy, create additional difficulties in achieving the required level of safety and effectiveness of the therapy. Understanding differences in the activity of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes is important for preventing adverse drug reactions that may develop as a result of drug interactions.

The data obtained emphasize the need for further population pharmacogenetic studies with larger sample sizes to assess the contribution of rare but potentially significant polymorphisms.

References

1. Kurbanova DI. Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs and its significance for individualization of therapy. Zamonaviy tibbiyot jurnali (Journal of Modern Medicine). 2026;12(1):436-440. (In Russ.).

2. Musaeva DM. Personification of pharmacotherapy – the requirement of the time. Integrative dentistry and maxillofacial surgery. 2022;1(1):47-49. (In Russ.).

3. Zhao M, Ma J, Li M, et al. Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Drug Metabolism in Humans. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021; 22(23):12808. Published 2021 Nov 26. doi:10.3390/ijms222312808.

4. Rasool GS, Al-Awadi SJ, Hussien AA, AlAttar MM. Genetic variation of CYP2C9 gene and its correlation with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Molecular biology reports. 2024;51(1): 105. Published 2024 Jan 16. doi:10.1007/s11033-023-09151-4.

5. Sangkuhl K, Claudio-Campos K, Cavallari LH, et al. PharmVar GeneFocus: CYP2C9. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2021;110(3):662-676. doi:10.1002/cpt.2333.

6. Bogdanova VO, Golikova OS, Kudrina VG, Dolgusheva YuA. Drug-drug interactions in clinical practice: a literature review and SWOT analysis. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2024;46(3):124–130. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/medtech202446031124.

7. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2025. International journal of stroke: official journal of the International Stroke Society. 2025; 20(2):132-144. doi:10.1177/17474930241308142.

8. Barulin A. E., Kurushina O. V., Chernovolenko E. P. Neurorehabilitation after stroke. Nervous diseases. 2021;(1):72-76. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24412/2226-0757-2021-12310.

9. Bhusal T, Bista D, Shrestha RK. Study on risk factors and associated drug related problems in patients with stroke. BMC neurology. 2025; 25(1):117. doi:10.1186/s12883-025-04130-7.

10. Rangraz Jeddi F, Nabovati E, Peykani F, et al. Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in a Cardiac Center: Development of Simple Software for Pattern Identification. The journal of Tehran Heart Center. 2022;17(4):215-222. doi:10.18502/jthc.v17i4.11610.

11. Sharaeva AT., Zurdinova AA., Satybaldieva AT. Monitoring and safety assessment of drug-drug interactions in elderly patients. Good Clinical Practice. 2024;(2):52-65. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37489/2588-0519-2024-2-51-64.

12. Abrignani MG, Lombardo A, Braschi A, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and gastroprotection in patients treated with antithrombotic drugs: A cardiologic point of view. World journal of cardiology. 2023;15(8):375-394. doi:10.4330/wjc.v15.i8.375.

13. Anfinogenova ND, Stepanov VA, Chernyavsky AM, et al. Clinical Significance and Patterns of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Cardiovascular Patients: Focus on LowDose Aspirin and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024;13(15):4289. doi:10.3390/jcm13154289.

14. Kovalskaya GN, Zhukova DY, Mikhalevich EN. Interaction of Drugs Used for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019;4(1):36-42. (In Russ.). doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019-4.1.6.

15. Cho SM, Lee KY, Choi JR, Lee KA. Development and Comparison of Warfarin Dosing Algorithms in Stroke Patients. Yonsei medical journal. 2016;57(3):635-640. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.635.

16. Shuev GN, Sychev DA, Suleymanov SSh, et al. Comparison of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, ABCB1, SLCO1B1 gene polymorphism frequency in Russian and Nanai populations. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2016;(2):12-18. (In Russ.).


About the Authors

N. A. Vorobyeva
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Nadezda A. Vorobyeva — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy

Arkhangelsk



S. A. Sharapova
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sofiia A. Sharapova — student

Arkhangelsk



A. S. Vorontsova
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Alexandra S. Vorontsova — Cand. Sci. (Med.), assistant at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy

Arkhangelsk



O. A. Kharkova
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Kharkova — Cand. Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Research Methodology Department, Dean of the Faculty of Clinical Psychology, Social Work and Adaptive Physical Education

Arkhangelsk



Review

For citations:


Vorobyeva N.A., Sharapova S.A., Vorontsova A.S., Kharkova O.A. Pharmacogenetic aspects of drug interactions in stroke patients (using the CYP2C9 gene as an example). Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2026;(2):106-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2686-8849-0015. EDN: XAJHII

Views: 60

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0527 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8849 (Online)