Preview

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics

Advanced search

The contribution of polymorphic gene loci to the pharmacoresistance of patients with schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-0004

EDN: HVFULC

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

Relevance. Despite the use of antipsychotic drugs is still one of the most effective treatment methods of schizophrenia, the 20–30 % of patients do not respond adequately to pharmacotherapy. This inefficacy may stem from genetic variability, which influences drug metabolism, adverse reactions, and treatment response, alongside gene-environment interactions. This study aimed to investigate the association between polymorphic gene loci and pharmacoresistant schizophrenia among Belarusian patients.

Objective. To study the relationship of a number of polymorphic gene loci with pharmacoresistance (FR) in patients with schizophrenia, residents of Belarus.

Methods. The study included 161 people with schizophrenia. The main group included 104 patients with no improvement when treating with two or more antipsychotics (including an atypical antipsychotic) for 6 to 8 weeks; the comparison group included 57 patients with positive response to pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. Pharmacogenetic testing was performed using standard methods of nucleic acid isolation and PCR analysis. 19 polymorphic loci in 15 genes (CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP1A2; MDR1, ANKK1, HTR1A, HTR2A, SLC6A4, HTR2C, COMT, MAOA, BDNF,

DRD2, UGT1A1) were genotyped. Statistical processing of clinical and genotyping data was carried out using the SPSS Statistics 20.0 program. The odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were used as an indicator of the relationship between alleles and genotypes with the risk of developing PR.

Results. Comparison of the genotypes and alleles frequencies in the studied groups of patients with schizophrenia revealed an association of PR in carriers of alleles — A (CYP2D6, rs3892097) (χ2=4.124; p=0.042), G (COMT, rs4680) (χ2=9.006; p=0.003); AG genotype (CYP2D6, rs3892097) (χ2=6,647; р=0,01), CC genotype (HTR1A, rs6295) (χ2=5.522; p=0.019). Further analysis revealed an increase in the risk of PR when these alleles were combined with other gene loci. Patients with pharmacogenetic profiles A-/A(CYP2D6 / CYP1A2), (OR 2.926; CI 1.206–7.102); A-/B-/T(CYP2D6 / CYP1A2 / MDR1), (OR 4.833) had an increased risk of developing FR; CI 1,753–13,328); G-/L(COMT / SLC6A4), (OR 3,172; CI 1,500–6,709); G-/LL (COMT / SLC6A4), (OR 6,923; CI 1,900–25,227); G-/LL/T(COMT / SLC6A4 / MDR1), (OR =11.143; CI 2.415–51.414); CC/T(HTR1A / MDR1), (OR 2.564; CI 1.120–5.873).

Conclusion. A study using pharmacogenetic testing of residents of Belarus with schizophrenia revealed a significant association of the risk of PR with polymorphic loci of the genes CYP2D6 (rs3892097), HTR1A (rs6295), COMT (rs4680). An increased risk of PR was observed when the identified alleles were combined with polymorphic loci of the CYP1A2 (rs762551), MDR1 (rs1045642), and SLC6A4 (5-HTTLPR) genes. Pharmacogenetic risk profiles for the development of PR during antipsychotic therapy in patients with schizophrenia are described.

For citations:


Golubeva T.S., Kaminskaya J.M., Halayenka I.M., Sergeev G.V., Hreben N.F., Obedkov V.G., Bokut O.S., Haidukevich I.V., Dakukina T.V. The contribution of polymorphic gene loci to the pharmacoresistance of patients with schizophrenia. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2026;(1):24-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-0004. EDN: HVFULC

Introduction

Modern therapy for schizophrenia, based on the use of antipsychotic drugs, is an effective treatment method for many patients. However, according to various studies, 20 to 30% of patients with schizophrenia do not respond to treatment or have an unsatisfactory response [1].

The reason for the ineffectiveness of schizophrenia treatment may be genetic variability, which, along with other factors, determines individual characteristics of response to drug therapy for schizophrenia [2]. It has been established that both common and rare variants of genes associated with the risk of schizophrenia, antipsychotic metabolism, adverse drug reactions, as well as gene-environment interactions depending on ethnic background, contribute to the genetic determination of response to drug therapy [3, 4].

Pharmacogenetic testing aids in making clinically significant decisions when choosing patient treatment strategies in cases where antipsychotic therapy fails to achieve the expected clinical effect and there is a risk of developing chronic and highly disabling pharmacoresistant schizophrenia [5, 6]. To facilitate the implementation of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice, guidelines are being developed with evidence-based recommendations for optimizing pharmacotherapy, describing gene-drug interactions between genes and antipsychotics [7]. Response to drug therapy is a complex human trait, where the magnitude of the therapeutic effect, given intra- and inter-population polygenic variability, depends on the cumulative small effects of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions along the response pathway [3, 4, 8–10]. The neurobiological mechanisms of therapy-resistant schizophrenia remain poorly understood. Attempts are being made to investigate its polygenic architecture, identify reliably associated specific gene variants, and establish the genetic link between the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and the mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs [9, 11]. Therefore, there are currently no specific pharmacogenetic tests for pharmacoresistant schizophrenia. Pharmacogenetic markers with proven impact on the efficacy of schizophrenia therapy include polymorphic loci of the CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genes [12, 13]. Their genetic variants influence the functioning of the cytochrome P450 enzymes they encode. The algorithms for antipsychotic therapy proposed by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for psychiatry are based on these variants [6]. Regarding the response to antipsychotic therapy for schizophrenia, the role of many polymorphic variants of genes such as COMTMAOA/BCYP1A2ABCB1LINC01795DDHD2SBNO1KCNG2SEMA7ARUFY1, and others has been discussed [6, 14, 15], including in specific clinical cases [6, 16]. Currently, many researchers agree that for each distinct population and ethnic sample, the search remains relevant for those significant pharmacogenes whose polymorphic loci may serve as reliable biomarkers of complex gene-environment interaction effects in shaping the overall response to antipsychotic therapy.

Objective of the study was to investigate the association of a panel of polymorphic gene loci with pharmacoresistance in patients with schizophrenia among residents of Belarus.

Materials and Methods

Participants and study design. This prospective comparative clinical study employed a targeted patient selection method and included 161 individuals with schizophrenia (ICD-10 code: F20) undergoing inpatient treatment at the Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Mental Health. Patient selection criteria included: diagnosis of schizophrenia (ICD-10 code: F20), age 18–60 years, signed informed consent to participate in the study, absence of concomitant somatic diseases in the acute phase, and absence of acute infectious diseases.

The main group of pharmacoresistant patients consisted of 104 individuals aged 18 to 60 years (38.0±1.0 years): 62 women, 42 men; the comparison group included 57 patients without pharmacoresistance, aged 18 to 60 years (41.0±1.1 years): 27 women, 30 men. The groups were homogeneous in terms of age, characteristics of the underlying disease, and social status. All patients received treatment with psychotropic medications according to the clinical protocol for providing medical care to patients with mental and behavioral disorders. Pharmacoresistance was defined as the absence of improvement in psychopathological symptoms despite oral administration of adequate medication doses for 6 to 8 weeks, during which two or more antipsychotics were used, with at least one being atypical [17].

Clinical methods. Sociodemographic data (sex, age, age at disease onset), family history of mental illness, number of hospitalizations over the last 10 years, and smoking status were collected for each patient. The assessment of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders was based on the following scales: Clinical Global Impression – Global Improvement scale (CGI); psychometric assessment using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS); assessment of functional impairment in different social domains; and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS-A).

Biological material for the study. Saliva was used as the biological material for genomic DNA extraction, collected using the Oragene OG-500 saliva collection system (DNAgenotek, USA). Sample collection was carried out at the clinical diagnostic laboratory and clinical inpatient departments of the Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Mental Health.

Pharmacogenetic analysis. Genotyping was performed for patients included in the study for polymorphic loci of cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme genes: CYP2D63, CYP2D64, CYP2D610, CYP2C92, CYP2C93, CYP2C192, CYP2C1917, CYP1A2F; the C3435T locus of the MDR1 gene (encoding the P-glycoprotein transport protein); as well as polymorphic loci of drug target genes and functionally related proteins: the TaqI polymorphism of ANKK1 (ankyrin kinase 1 gene), the C-1019G polymorphism of the serotonin receptor gene HTR1A, the 1438G>A polymorphism of the serotonin receptor gene HTR2A, the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4, the rs1414334 polymorphism of the serotonin receptor gene HTR2C, the Val158Met polymorphism of the COMT gene (catechol-O-methyltransferase), the uVNTR polymorphism of the MAOA gene (monoamine oxidase A), the Val66Met polymorphism of the BDNF gene (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), the C957T polymorphism of the dopamine receptor gene DRD2, and the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism of the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1 gene. Genomic DNA from saliva was isolated using the "DNA-BK" kit (Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Belarus). Pharmacogenetic testing was conducted at the Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, using the "OLIGO-GENFARM" diagnostic oligonucleotide kit for determining genetic markers of pharmacoresistance to psychotropic drugs (Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Belarus). PCR and real-time PCR were performed on a CFX96 instrument (BioRad, USA). Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis used restriction endonucleases from NEB (England): AvaII (*CYP2C92 rs1799853), KpnI (CYP2C93 rs1057910), SmaI (CYP2C192 rs4244285), KpnI (CYP2C1917 rs12248560), BstNI (CYP2D64 rs3892097), ApaI (CYP1A21F rs762551), MboI (MDR1* rs1045642), BtsCI (HTR1A rs6295), followed by separation of restriction products in agarose/acrylamide gel according to the "OLIGO-GENFARM" kit instructions. Markers TaqI (rs1800497) of the ANKK1 gene, 1438G>A (rs6311) of the HTR2A gene, rs1414334 of the HTR2C gene, Val158Met (rs4680) of the COMT gene, Val66Met (rs6265) of the BDNF gene, C957T (rs6277) of the DRD2 gene, UGT1A1*28 (rs8175347), and CYP2D63 (rs35742686) were detected by real-time PCR according to the "OLIGO-GENFARM" kit instructions. The 5-HTTLPR polymorphism of the SLC6A4 gene and the 30bp uVNTR polymorphism of the MAOA gene were determined by amplified fragment length analysis using capillary electrophoresis on an AB3500 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Statistical analysis. SPSS Statistics 20.0 software was used for the preparation and analysis of clinical data and genotyping data. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as measures of association between genotypes and the risk of developing a specific phenotype.

Results

This study included 161 patients with schizophrenia (89 women and 72 men), of whom 104 patients were resistant to antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. The control group of treatment-responsive patients consisted of 57 individuals. For the treatment of schizophrenia patients, the most frequently used antipsychotic drug was the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (42.1%); a combination of atypical and typical antipsychotics was also commonly used (39.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Frequency of prescribing medications to patients with schizophrenia

MedicationPrescription frequency, %
Quetiapine3.5
Clozapine42.1
Olanzapine5.3
Risperidone5.3
Haloperidol1.8
Zuclopenthixol1.8
Fluphenazine0.9
Multiple antipsychotics39.5
TotalN=161 (100.0)

Genotyping was performed for 19 polymorphic loci in 15 genes. Table 2 indicates the putative risk alleles and the genotypes containing them for each polymorphic locus of the studied genes, according to literature data. In the total patient sample, we analyzed allele frequency distribution to check for compliance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was observed for all studied loci. To investigate the association of polymorphic gene loci with pharmacoresistance (PR), an association analysis was performed comparing the groups.

Table 2. Analysis of the association of polymorphic gene loci with pharmacoresistance in patients with schizophrenia

Gene 

Polymorphic locus 

Genetic risk factor (allele/genotype)

Patient groups

Pearson χ²

Significance level P

 

Pharmacoresistant

Control

 

N=104

N=57

 

n

%

n

%

 

 CYP1A2

rs762551

А (АА+AC)

92

88,5

53

93,0

0,841

0,359

 

CYP2C9

rs1799853

Т ( ТТ+ TC)

18

17,5

13

23,6

1,605

0,447

 

rs1057910

С (CC+СA)

17

16,5

11

20,0

0,300

0,584

 

CYP2C19

rs4244285

А (АА+AG)

25

24,0

16

28,1

0,315

0,574

 

rs12248560

Т (ТТ +ТС)

46

44,7

25

43,9

0,01

0,922

 

CYP2D6

rs4986774 (n=149)

Т (T/- )

3

3,2

0

0

1,791

0,181

 

rs3892097

А (АА+AG)

38

36,5

12

21,4

4,124*

0,042

 

AG

34

32,7

8

15,8

6,647*

0,01

 

rs1065852 (n=139)

А (АА+AG)

26

29,9

11

21,2

2,409

0,121

 

 MDR1

rs1045642 C3435T

Т (TT+TC)

77

74,0

47

82,5

1,474

0,225

 

 SLC6A4

5-HTTLPR

S (SS-SL)

67

65,0

35

63,6

0,031

0,860

 

HTR1A

rs6295

G (GG+GС)

72

69,2

49

86,0

5,522*

0,019

 

CC

32

30,8

8

14,0

 

 HTR2A

rs6311(n=135)

A (АА+AG)

56

66,7

33

65,3

0,146

0,702

 

HTR2C

rs1414334 (n=155)

C (CC+CG)

26

26,3

9

16,1

2,125

0,145

 

 MAOA

uVNTR (30bp-VNTR)

3R/3R+ 3R/4R

55

52,9

26

45,6

0,779

0,378

 

ANKK1

rs1800497(n=148)

A (AA+AG)

31

33,0

21

38,9

0,526

0,468

 

 DRD2

rs6277 (n=155)

C (CC+CT)

80

80,0

40

74,0

1,074

0,300

 

 BDNF

rs6265 (n=155)

A (AA+AG)

22

22,2

14

25,0

0,155

0,694

 

 COMT

rs4680 (n=155)

G (GG+GA)

65

65,0

22

40,0

9,006*

0,003

 

АА

35

35,0

33

60,0

 

 UGT

rs3064744 (*28) (n=154)

ТА(7)/TA(7) + TA(6)/TA(7)

59

59,0

35

64,9

0,499

0,480

 

*Note: Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

Analysis of genotype and allele frequencies revealed an association of PR with three polymorphic loci: CYP2D6 (rs3892097), HTR1A (rs6295), and COMT (rs4680) (Table 2). PR was associated with the A allele (CYP2D64) (rs3892097) of the CYP2D6 gene (χ²=4.124, p=0.042), the G allele of the serotonin receptor gene HTR1A (rs6295) (χ²=5.522, p=0.019), and the G allele of the COMT gene (rs4680) (χ²=9.006, p=0.003) (Table 2).

The risk of developing PR was identified in carriers of the A allele and the AG genotype at the *4* polymorphic locus (rs3892097) of the CYP2D6 gene (OR 2.159; 95% CI 1.018-4.578 and OR 2.975; 95% CI 1.269-6.977, respectively), the CC genotype (rs6295) of the HTR1A gene (OR 2.703; 95% CI 1.151-6.348), and the G allele (rs4680) of the COMT gene (OR 2.786; 95% CI 1.414-5.489). Protective effects against the risk of developing PR were found for the GG genotype (rs3892097) of the CYP2D6 gene (OR 0.463; 95% CI 0.218-0.928), the G allele (rs6295) of the HTR1A gene (OR 0.367; 95% CI 0.156-0.864), and the AA (Met/Met) genotype (rs4680) of the COMT gene (OR 0.359; 95% CI 0.182-0.707).

To further investigate the association of PR risk with combinations of alleles and genotypes of other polymorphic loci, a comparative analysis of the frequency of occurrence of polymorphic loci of the CYP2D6HTR1ACOMT genes in combination with polymorphic loci of other genes included in the study was performed. Combinations significantly associated with the PR trait are presented in Table 3.

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| |  (n) | % |  (n) | % | |

Table 3. Comparison of the frequency distribution of significant combinations of alleles and genotypes in patients with schizophrenia

Combination of alleles/genotypes of polymorphic loci in patient genetic profiles

Patient groups

 

OR, 95% CI

Pearson χ², significance level p

Pharmacoresistant

Control

n

%

 n

%

CYP2D6*4 (AA+AG)

CYP1A2*F (AA+AC)

31

38,8

8

17,8

OR 2,926

CI 1,206–7,102

5,901

p=0,015

CYP2D6*4 АG

CYP1A2*F AA

21

43,8

2

7,4

OR 9,722

CI 2,065–45,763

10,734

p=0,001

CYP2D6*4 (AA+AG)

MDR1 (TT+CT)

36

46,8

10

21,3

OR 3,249

CI 1,417–7,448

8,118

p=0,004

CYP2D6*4 AG

MDR1 (TT+CT)

32

41,6

7

14,9

OR 4,063

CI 1,616–10,218

9,625

p=0,002

MDR1 (TT+CT)

CYP1A2*F (AA+AC)

CYP2D6*4 (AA+AG)

29

42,2

6

16,7

OR 4,833

CI 1,753–13,328

 

10,140

p=0,001

COMT G (GG+GA)

5-HTTLPR L (LL+SL)

56

63,6

16

35,6

OR 3,172

CI 1,500–6,709

9,456

p=0,002

COMT G (GG+GA)

5-HTTLPRS (LL)

24

64,9

4

21,1

OR 6,923

CI 1,900–25,227

9,639

p=0,002

COMT (GG+GA)

5-HTTLPRS LL

MDR1 (TT+CT)

18

72,0

3

18,8

OR 11,143

CI 2,415–51,414

11,072

p=0,001

HTR1A (GG+GC)

MDR1 (TT+CT)

53

68,8

42

89,4

OR 0,263

CI 0,092-0,748

6,866

p=0,009

HTR1A (CC)

MDR1 (TT+CT)

24

31,2

5

10,6

OR 2,564

CI 1,120-5,873

6,866

p=0,009

It was found that certain combinations of alleles or genotypes at polymorphic gene loci can significantly increase the risk of PR. An increased OR for PR risk was observed with the combination of the CYP2D6 A allele with the CYP1A2 A allele (OR 2.926; 95% CI 1.206-7.102); with the MDR1 T allele (OR 3.249; 95% CI 1.417-7.448); and with the CYP1A2 A and MDR1 T alleles together (OR 4.833; 95% CI 1.753-13.328). For the COMT G (Val) allele, an increased PR risk was found in combination with the *5-HTTLPR* L allele (OR 3.172; 95% CI 1.500-6.709) and the *5-HTTLPR* LL genotype (OR 6.923; 95% CI 1.900-25.227), as well as with the MDR1 T allele and the *5-HTTLPR* LL genotype (OR 11.143; 95% CI 2.415-51.414). The combination of the HTR1A CC genotype with the MDR1 T allele also increased the PR risk (OR 2.564; 95% CI 1.120-5.873).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to identify pharmacogenetic risk profiles for the development of PR among patients with schizophrenia. The panel of tested potential pharmacogenetic markers included 19 polymorphic loci in 15 genes (CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP2C19CYP1A2MDR1ANKK1HTR1AHTR2ASLC6A4HTR2CCOMTMAOA, BDNFDRD2UGT1A1), which, according to literature data, affect both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antipsychotics.

We failed to detect significant differences in the distribution of allele and genotype frequencies between the group of pharmacoresistant patients and the group of patients responding to antipsychotic pharmacotherapy for the following loci: CYP2C9 (*2(rs1799853), 3(rs1057910)), CYP2C19 (2(rs4244285), 17(rs12248560)), CYP2D6 (3 (rs4986774), *10 (rs1065852)), NKK1 (rs1800497), HTR2A (rs6311), HTR2C (rs1414334), MAOA (uVNTR (30bp-VNTR)), BDNF (rs6265), DRD2 (rs6277), UGT1A1 (*28 (rs3064744)).

However, for the polymorphic loci of the CYP2D6 (rs3892097), HTR1A (rs6295), and COMT (rs4680) genes, we found a significant association with the development of PR in patients with schizophrenia. These polymorphic loci have been previously discussed in the literature in the context of searching for genetic markers of PR during antipsychotic treatment in different population samples [2, 4, 5]. Our research confirmed the significance of these loci as pharmacogenetic markers of PR for the population of Belarus. Table 4 presents data from other authors' studies regarding the association of specific genetic loci with the risk of developing PR (and adverse drug reactions), associations that were confirmed in the present study. As can be seen, both minor and major alleles may be associated with PR risk. The more frequently a pharmacogenetic marker occurs in a population, the more important its use in genetic testing when choosing antipsychotic therapy.

Table 4. Characterization of polymorphic gene loci

Gene / Polymorphic locus, product functionAllele associated with risk, functional changesFrequency (%) in European population (gnomAD Genome*)Association with risk
CYP1A2 *1F/rs762551 EnzymeA (increased function)71.18Low antipsychotic (AP) concentration, inefficacy of AP therapy, tardive dyskinesia [14, 18–20]
CYP2D6 *4/rs3892097 EnzymeA (no function)19.86High AP concentration, extrapyramidal symptoms, frequent hospitalization, severe outcome [7, 19, 21–26]
COMT rs4680 Enzyme (dopamine catabolism)A (decreased function)51.80Pharmacoresistance, extrapyramidal symptoms, tardive dyskinesia [14, 27–29]
 G (active function)48.20 
MDR1 C3435T rs1045642 TransporterT (decreased function)53.12Altered AP concentration, adverse effects, severe outcome [2, 19, 24, 26]
 C (active function)46.88 
SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR TransporterS (decreased function)44.3 [16]Inefficacy of AP therapy [30, 31]
HTR1A rs6295 ReceptorC49.97Inefficacy of therapy, altered AP blood concentration [32]
 G (decreased neurotransmission)50.03 

*Note: Based on gnomAD v2.1.1 (Genome) unless otherwise cited.

For the polymorphic locus rs3892097 of the cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 gene, our data are consistent with previously obtained results. It has been shown that the probability of developing PR is increased in patients carrying this poor metabolizer A allele [5, 12, 24]. The frequency of this minor A allele in individuals of European descent is 18.55% according to the GnomAD database (Table 4). We demonstrated that the probability of developing PR in Belarusian residents is significantly increased when the A allele (CYP2D64) is combined with the common A allele of the CYP1A2 gene (rs762551) and the T allele of the MDR1 gene (rs1045642). The frequency of pharmacoresistant patients with A-/A- (CYP2D6/CYP1A2), A-/T- (CYP2D6/MDR1), or A-/A-/T- (CYP2D6/CYP1A2/MDR1) genotypes reaches proportions of 38.8%, 46.8%, and 42.2%, respectively. Moreover, for carriers of the AG/AA (CYP2D6/CYP1A2) genotypes, the odds ratio reaches its maximum value (OR 9.143) (Table 3), indicating a very high likelihood of PR development in patients with this combination of genotypes.

The frequency of the G (Val) allele of the polymorphic locus rs4680 of the COMT gene (catechol-O-methyltransferase enzyme) among pharmacoresistant schizophrenia patients from Belarus was significantly higher (65%) than in the general European population (48.2%) (Table 4) and among patients who responded to antipsychotic therapy (40%) (Table 2). Literature data indicate that the G (Val) allele is associated with rapid dopamine metabolism and the risk of PR [14, 33]. However, other studies have shown that PR risk is associated with the A allele [34]. In our study, PR risk was associated with the presence of the G allele at the COMT rs4680 locus (OR 2.786) and increased further in combination with the L allele (5-HTTLPR) of the serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4 (OR 6.923). Carriers of the combination of alleles/genotypes G-/LL/T- (COMT / SLC6A4 / MDR1) had the highest PR risk indicator (OR 11.143) (Table 3).

For the polymorphic locus rs6295 of the serotonin receptor gene HTR1A, it has previously been established that reduced serotonergic neurotransmission is associated with the G allele, which also showed an association with the risk of several psychiatric disorders [35]. However, according to data obtained in the present study, the CC genotype (OR 2.722) acts as a genetic risk factor for PR. Among the European population, according to the GnomAD database, the G and C alleles occur with equal frequency (Table 4). In the present study, the proportion of patients carrying the PR risk genotype CC was twice as high as the proportion of patients responding to antipsychotic pharmacotherapy (30.8% and 14%, respectively), corroborating recently published data [32, 36, 37] indicating the differential significance of the alleles of this locus depending on sex and ethnicity.

Conclusion

Thus, this study conducted on schizophrenia patients from Belarus demonstrated a significant association of carrying polymorphic loci of the CYP2D6 (rs3892097), HTR1A (rs6295), and COMT (rs4680) genes with an increased risk of PR, both as individual genetic factors and in combination with polymorphic loci of other studied genes (CYP1A2 (rs762551), MDR1 (rs1045642), SLC6A4 (5-HTTLPR)). Pharmacogenetic risk profiles for the development of PR during antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia were described: the highest PR risk indicator in our study was found in carriers of the combination of alleles/genotypes G-/LL/T- of the COMT / SLC6A4 / MDR1 genes (OR 11.143), as well as carriers of the AG/AA (CYP2D6 / CYP1A2) genotypes (OR 9.143). The identified associations of carrying alleles and genotypes of polymorphic gene loci with the response to antipsychotic drug treatment allow them to be used as pharmacogenetic markers in the treatment of schizophrenia patients of Belarusian and European descent with antipsychotic (typical and atypical) medications. However, the obtained data require confirmation in a larger patient cohort.

References

1. Elkis H. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;30(3):511-33. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2007.04.001.

2. Płaza O, Gałecki P, Orzechowska A, et al. Pharmacogenetics and Schizophrenia-Can Genomics Improve the Treatment with Second-Generation Antipsychotics? Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 7;10 (12):3165. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123165.

3. Harrison PJ. Recent genetic findings in schizophrenia and their therapeutic relevance. J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;29(2):85-96. doi: 10.1177/0269881114553647.

4. Alchakee A, Ahmed M, Eldohaji L, et al. Pharmacogenomics in Psychiatry Practice: The Value and the Challenges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022 Nov;23(21):13485. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113485.

5. Pouget JG, Shams TA, Tiwari AK, Müller DJ. Pharmacogenetics and outcome with antipsychotic drugs. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014 Dec; 16(4):555-66. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.4/jpouget.

6. Belančić A, Pavešić Radonja A, Ganoci L, et al. Challenging pharmacotherapy management of a psychotic disorder due to a delicate pharmacogenetic profile and drug-drug interactions: a case report and literature review. Croat Med J. 2024 Aug 31;65(4):383-395. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.383.

7. Beunk L, Nijenhuis M, Soree B, et al. Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction between CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and non-SSRI/non-TCA antidepressants. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Nov;32(11):1371- 1377. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01648-1.

8. Patel RA, Musharoff SA, Spence JP, et al. Genetic interactions drive heterogeneity in causal variant effect sizes for gene expression and complex traits. Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Jul 7;109(7):1286- 1297. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.05.014.

9. Pardiñas AF, Smart SE, Willcocks IR, et al; Genetics Workstream of the Schizophrenia Treatment Resistance and Therapeutic Advances (STRATA) Consortium and the Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC); Ajnakina O, Alameda L, Barnes TRE, et al. Interaction Testing and Polygenic Risk Scoring to Estimate the Association of Common Genetic Variants With Treatment Resistance in Schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;79(3):260- 269. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3799.

10. Koch E, Kämpe A, Alver M, et al. Polygenic liability for antipsychotic dosage and polypharmacy - a real-world registry and biobank study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Jun;49(7):1113- 1119. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01792-0.

11. Lenk HÇ, Koch E, O'Connell KS, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of treatment resistant schizophrenia for variant discovery and polygenic assessment. Hum Genomics. 2024 Sep 27;18(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00673-x.

12. Sandhu AK, Naderi E, Wijninga MJ, et al. Pharmacogenetics of Long-Term Outcomes of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: The Functional Role of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 4;13(9):1354. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091354.

13. Goloenko I.M., Obedkov V.G., Golubeva T.S., et al. The relevance of pharmacogenetic testing in antipsychotic therapy of schizophrenia. Molecular and Applied Genetics 2023; 34: 121-132. (In Russ.).

14. Taheri N, Pirboveiri R, Sayyah M, et al. Association of DRD2, DRD4 and COMT genes variants and their gene-gene interactions with antipsychotic treatment response in patients with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05292-9.

15. Guo LK, Su Y, Zhang YY, et al. Prediction of treatment response to antipsychotic drugs for precision medicine approach to schizophrenia: randomized trials and multiomics analysis. Mil Med Res. 2023 Jun 2;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00459-7.

16. Korošec Hudnik L, Blagus T, Redenšek Trampuž S, et al. Case report: Avoiding intolerance to antipsychotics through a personalized treatment approach based on pharmacogenetics. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 19;15:1363051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1363051.

17. Kane JM, Agid O, Baldwin ML, et al. Clinical Guidance on the Identification and Management of Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 5;80(2):18com12123. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18com12123.

18. Fekete F, Menus Á, Tóth K, et al. CYP1A2 expression rather than genotype is associated with olanzapine concentration in psychiatric patients. Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 28;13(1):18507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45752-6.

19. Tsermpini EE, Redenšek S, Dolžan V. Genetic Factors Associated With Tardive Dyskinesia: From Pre-clinical Models to Clinical Studies. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 24;12:834129. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.834129.

20. Laika B, Leucht S, Heres S, et al. Pharmacogenetics and olanzapine treatment: CYP1A2*1F and serotonergic polymorphisms influence ther apeutic outcome. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010 Feb;10(1):20-9. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2009.32.

21. Cojocaru A, Braha A, Jeleriu R, et al. The Implications of Cytochrome P450 2D6/CYP2D6 Polymorphism in the Therapeutic Response of Atypical Antipsychotics in Adolescents with Psychosis-A Prospective Study. Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 22;12(3):494. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030494.

22. Stephan PL, Jaquenoud Sirot E, Mueller B, et al. Adverse drug reactions following nonresponse in a depressed patient with CYP2D6 deficiency and low CYP 3A4/5 activity. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2006 Jul;39(4):150-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-946705.

23. Crescenti A, Mas S, Gassó P, et al. Cyp2d6*3, *4, *5 and *6 polymorphisms and antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal side-effects in patients receiving antipsychotic therapy. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008 Jul;35(7):807-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04918.x.

24. Obiedkov V., Halayenka I.,Bokut O., et al. Genetic markers of pharmacokinetic features in patients with a severe outcome of schizophrenia, resistant to antipsychotic therapy Sci. Innov. 2023;7:78-83. (In Russ.) doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2023-07-78-83.

25. Golubeva T, Obyedkov V, Dokukina T, et al. Possible association of polymorphism cyp2d6 * 4 with frequent hospital stay of patients with schizophrenia. Polish Journal Of Applied Sciences.2021;6(2):29-33. doi:10.34668/PJAS.2020.6.2.04.

26. Halayenka I.M., Objedkov V.G., Gorgun O.V., et al. Quantitative distribution of risk genotypes for schizophrenia patients withantipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms in Belarusian population Medical Genetics. 2020;19(4):22-23. (In Russ.) doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2020.04.22-23.

27. Bakker PR, van Harten PN, van Os J. Antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia and polymorphic variations in COMT, DRD2, CYP1A2 and MnSOD genes: a meta-analysis of pharmacogenetic interactions. Mol Psychiatry. 2008 May; 13(5):544-56. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002142.

28. Zivković M, Mihaljević-Peles A, Bozina N, et al. The association study of polymorphisms in DAT, DRD2, and COMT genes and acute extrapyramidal adverse effects in male schizophrenic patients treated with haloperidol. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Oct;33(5):593-9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31829abec9.

29. Rajagopal VM, Rajkumar AP, Jacob KS, Jacob M. Gene-gene interaction between DRD4 and COMT modulates clinical response to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2018 Jan;28(1):31-35. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000314.

30. Llerena A, Berecz R, Peñas-Lledó E, et al. Pharmacogenetics of clinical response to risperidone. Pharmacogenomics. 2013Jan;14(2):177-94. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.201.

31. Spiros A, Geerts H. Toward Predicting Impact of Common Genetic Variants on Schizophrenia Clinical Responses With Antipsychotics: AQuantitative System Pharmacology Study. Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 29;15:738903. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.738903.

32. Qin Y, Zhao J, Yang Y, et al. Association of HTR1A Gene Polymorphisms with Efficacy and Plasma Concentrations of Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Male Patients with Schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Jan 30;20:185-193. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S449096.

33. Huang E, Zai CC, Lisoway A, et al. Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Val158Met Polymorphism and Clinical Response to Antipsychotic Treatment in Schizophrenia and Schizo-Affective Disorder Patients: a Meta-Analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Apr 29;19(5):pyv132. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv132.

34. Sagud M, Tudor L, Uzun S, et al. Haplotypic and Genotypic Association of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase rs4680 and rs4818 Polymorphisms and Treatment Resistance in Schizophrenia. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jul 3;9:705. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00705.

35. Huang YY, Battistuzzi C, Oquendo MA, et al. Human 5-HT1A receptor C(-1019)G polymorphism and psychopathology. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;7(4):441-51. doi: 10.1017/S1461145704004663.

36. Takekita Y, Fabbri C, Kato M, et al. HTR1A Polymorphisms and Clinical Efficacy of Antipsychotic Drug Treatment in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Apr 29;19(5):pyv125. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv125.

37. Yoshikawa A, Li J, Meltzer HY. A functional HTR1A polymorphism, rs6295, predicts shortterm response to lurasidone: confirmation with meta-analysis of other antipsychotic drugs. Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Apr;20(2):260-270. doi: 10.1038/s41397-019-0101-5.


About the Authors

T. S. Golubeva
Republican Research and Practice Center for Mental Health
Belarus

Tatyana S. Golubeva — Cand. Sci. (Bio), Associate professor, Head of the Department of Republican 

Minsk



J. M. Kaminskaya
Republican Research and Practice Center for Mental Health
Belarus

Julia M. Kaminskaya — Cand. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor, Director 

Minsk



I. M. Halayenka
Republican Research and Practice Center for Mental Health
Belarus

Inessa M. Halayenka — Cand. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher 

Minsk



G. V. Sergeev
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Gennady V. Sergeev — Cand. Sci. (Chemistry), Head of the laboratory

Minsk



N. F. Hreben
Republican Research and Practice Center for Mental Health
Belarus

Natalia F. Hreben — Senior Researcher of the Department 

Minsk



V. G. Obedkov
Belarusian State Medical University
Belarus

Victor G. Obedkov — Cand. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor of the Department of Psychiatry, Narcology, Psychotherapy and Medical Psychology with advanced training and retraining course 

Minsk



O. S. Bokut
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Olga S. Bokut — junior research assistant 

Minsk



I. V. Haidukevich
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Irina V. Haidukevich — Cand. Sci. (Chemistry), Senior Researcher 

Minsk



T. V. Dakukina
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Tatyana V. Dakukina — Dr. Sci. (Med), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher 

Minsk



What is already known about this topic?

  • 20–30% of patients with schizophrenia do not respond adequately to antipsychotic therapy (pharmacoresistance, PR).

  • Genetic variability influences drug metabolism, adverse reactions, and treatment efficacy.

  • Polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 are proven pharmacogenetic markers included in clinical guidelines.

  • Other genes (COMTHTR1AMDR1CYP1A2SLC6A4) have been discussed as potential markers of treatment response.

What is new in the article?

  • First comprehensive pharmacogenetic study in a Belarusian schizophrenia patient cohort (161 patients: 104 with PR, 57 without PR) covering 19 polymorphic loci in 15 genes.

  • Three polymorphic loci were significantly associated with PR:

    • CYP2D6 rs3892097 (A allele)

    • HTR1A rs6295 (CC genotype)

    • COMT rs4680 (G allele)

  • First description of pharmacogenetic risk profiles for PR in the Belarusian population:

    • G-/LL/T- (COMT / SLC6A4 / MDR1) → OR = 11.143

    • AG/AA (CYP2D6 / CYP1A2) → OR = 9.143

  • Combination of risk alleles from multiple genes significantly increases PR risk compared to single markers.

How can this affect clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

  • Personalized therapy: Identifying patients at high risk of PR before treatment initiation would allow timely prescription of alternative antipsychotics (e.g., clozapine) or dose adjustment.

  • Diagnostic panel development: The described genetic profiles could form the basis for the first specialized pharmacogenetic test for predicting PR in schizophrenia in Belarusian and possibly other European populations.

  • Preventive approach: Routine testing for CYP2D6COMTHTR1ACYP1A2MDR1, and SLC6A4 loci could prevent lengthy ineffective treatment courses, reduce hospitalization rates, and improve patients' quality of life.

  • Validation needed: These findings require confirmation in larger patient cohorts before routine clinical implementation.

Review

For citations:


Golubeva T.S., Kaminskaya J.M., Halayenka I.M., Sergeev G.V., Hreben N.F., Obedkov V.G., Bokut O.S., Haidukevich I.V., Dakukina T.V. The contribution of polymorphic gene loci to the pharmacoresistance of patients with schizophrenia. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2026;(1):24-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-0004. EDN: HVFULC

Views: 169

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0527 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8849 (Online)