Preview

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics

Advanced search

Ten years at the forefront of personalized medicine: from achievements to future transformation

https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2025-1-3-8

EDN: STSYZB

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the journal “Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics” and presents a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of the discipline. The article covers historical milestones: from the description of the first pharmacogenetic phenomena and the discovery of cytochrome P450 in the mid-20th century to modern multiomic approaches integrating genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. Particular attention is paid to the contribution of the journal, which published 242 scientific papers that transformed data on polymorphisms of key genes (CYP2D6, VKORC1, DPYD) into clinical algorithms. Systemic barriers to the implementation of pharmacogenetics in Russia are analyzed: limited use in clinical practice, persistently high cost of NGS sequencing, and the lack of uniform regulatory standards. Much attention in the articles is paid to "ethnopharmacogenetics" — the study of the frequencies of pharmacogenetic markers in the indigenous peoples of Russia, which is important for prioritizing the implementation of certain pharmacogenetic tests in different regions. The prospects for the development of pharmacogenetics include the creation of a National DNA Biobank and a register of patients with an “inadequate” pharmacological response, the development of models for predicting and personalizing pharmacotherapy taking into account pharmacogenetic markers, as well as their clinical validation and “packaging” in a system for supporting medical decision-making, which should be constantly updated based on new research results collected in the National Pharmacogenetic Research Knowledge Base. All this would be impossible without the development of pharmacogenetic test systems available for use in medical organizations in the country, as well as the formation of relevant competencies in doctors and other healthcare professionals. The future lies in integrating pharmacogenetics into comprehensive and large-scale clinical and pharmacological counseling of patients, including using telemedicine.

For citations:


Sychev D.A., Belousov D.Yu., Mirzaev K.B. Ten years at the forefront of personalized medicine: from achievements to future transformation. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2025;(1):3-8. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2025-1-3-8. EDN: STSYZB

Introduction

In 2025, our journal Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics celebrates a landmark date — a decade since its founding. Created in 2015 in response to the rapid growth of genomic technologies, the journal was conceived as a unique platform for integrating fundamental discoveries in the field of hereditary variability of drug response into everyday clinical practice. Over the past decade, it has exceeded expectations, becoming not just a publication, but a genuine catalyst for scientific dialogue and collaboration between clinical pharmacologists, medical geneticists, bioinformaticians, pharmacists and healthcare organizers. 242 original scientific papers published on our pages are not just a number. Each article became a brick in the foundation of overcoming the very “variability of patients” that William Osler (1849–1919) spoke about with deep understanding back in the 19th century, emphasizing that “there are no diseases in general, there are only diseases of a particular person,” but asserting that “if patients were not so different, medicine could well be a science, not an art” [1]. These works moved us from understanding the problem to developing specific tools for personalizing therapy, and pharmacogenetics is the most promising and closest tool to clinical practice. Pharmacogenetics is a science with deep historical roots dating back to the beginning of the 20th century and even earlier. From the description of the first pharmacogenetic phenomena (hemolytic anemia to antimalarial drugs in congenital glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, prolonged apnea in "congenital" pseudocholinesterase deficiency, malignant hyperthermia during the use of halogen-containing agents for inhalation anesthesia, etc.) [2], through the emergence of the term "pharmacogenetics" and the discovery in the 1950s of a universal heme-containing monooxygenase (cytochrome P450) in rat liver microsomes [3, 4], to the modern era of evidence-based medicine and high-throughput sequencing, including next-generation, the discipline has come a long way. It has evolved from the description of isolated "pharmacogenetic phenomena" causing adverse drug reactions to a systemic understanding of the complex polygenic nature of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the vast majority of drugs. From the very first issue, our journal's mission has been clearly focused on solving three interconnected and critically important tasks:

  1. Knowledge translation: transforming "association studies" of gene polymorphisms (such as CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, VKORC1, TPMT, UGT1A1, DPYD, ABCB1, SLCO1B1 and many others) into understandable, validated clinical algorithms and recommendations for dosing or drug selection.
  2. Education of physicians: actively developing the competencies of clinicians of various specialties (primarily clinical pharmacologists, but also internists, cardiologists, oncologists, psychiatrists, etc.) in determining indications and interpreting the results of pharmacogenetic tests and integrating them into the process of making medical decisions.
  3. Infrastructure development: scientific substantiation and promotion of ideas necessary for the creation of a modern infrastructure for personalized medicine: from the organization of DNA sample biobanks to the development of complex medical decision support systems (MDSS) integrated with medical information systems.

A striking example of success on this path was one of the early but landmark publications - the work of Chernov A.A. et al., in which one of the first domestic meta-analyses in the field of pharmacogenetics was conducted, as the most important tool for "increasing" the evidence of the influence of pharmacogenetic markers on clinical outcomes of patients [5]. According to the results of the first meta-analysis of domestic studies of the pharmacogenetics of clopidogrel in Russia, it was found that the presence of the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular death and other complications. Such studies have become a symbol of strengthening the evidence base for the effectiveness and feasibility of introducing pharmacogenetic testing into clinical practice.

However, a decade of progress does not mean a lack of challenges. Despite impressive achievements, the implementation of pharmacogenetics into routine clinical practice in the Russian Federation faces significant systemic barriers:

  • Clinical integration: unfortunately, only a limited number of medical organizations use pharmacogenetic approaches routinely, outside of highly specialized centers or research programs. The main reasons remain the lack of regulation of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical guidelines and standards and the lack of knowledge among some doctors, who perceive pharmacogenetics as an overly complex area.
  • Economic constraints: although the cost of high-throughput sequencing (NGS) has decreased 5 times over the past 10 years, it still remains a significant factor hindering the mass implementation of complex pharmacogenetic testing, especially in the context of budget financing of primary health care. At the same time, large-scale implementation of pharmacogenetic testing is possible through the creation of pharmacogenetic test systems for SNP analysis of the most clinically significant pharmacogenetic markers. Further work is required to optimize costs and justify the long-term economic efficiency of pharmacogenetic testing.
  • Regulatory gaps: a serious challenge remains the insufficient development of the regulatory framework governing the requirements for validation of analytical and clinical characteristics of pharmacogenetic test systems and panels. That is, some kind of standard is needed, such as "Quality Pharmacogenetic Practice".

By its anniversary, the editors not only sum up the results, but also approve an ambitious program for the journal's development for the next decade - until 2035, associated with the implementation of tasks aimed at the widespread introduction of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice in medical organizations in Russia, which should contribute, through increasing the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy, to increasing the expected life expectancy of our people:

  • creation of a National DNA Biobank and a register of patients with an "inadequate" pharmacological response, primarily when using vital and essential drugs for medical use, including on the basis of spontaneous reports, active monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including large-scale RWD / RWE studies;
  • conducting GWAS to identify pharmacogenetic markers for the development of ADRs and resistance when using drugs for diseases that make a significant contribution to morbidity and mortality in the population of Russia;
  • development of domestic forecasting models and algorithms for personalization of pharmacotherapy for such diseases (using machine learning), clinical validation and their clinical and economic assessment (assessment of health technologies) with subsequent immersion in clinical guidelines, standards, instructions;
  • development and registration of pharmacogenetic test systems based on PCR;
    creation of the National Pharmacogenetic Knowledge Base (constantly updated, including with the help of artificial intelligence), containing annotated information that allows them to be used in clinical practice for personalization of pharmacotherapy for patients, including data from domestic studies, including ethnopharmacogenetics;
  • creation on its basis of the SPVRS for clinical interpretation of pharmacogenetic testing results with the possibility of integration into the medical information system and the possibility of assessing effectiveness (including using the global trigger method);
  • development of competencies among healthcare professionals in the use of pharmacogenetic testing for personalization of pharmacotherapy;
  • creation of "Drug Information Centers" for the purpose of clinical and pharmacological consultations of healthcare professionals on the issues of effective and safe use of drugs, including issues of personalization of pharmacotherapy based on pharmacogenetic testing and therapeutic drug monitoring.

It is important that these tasks will be implemented in the newly created scientific Center for Predictive Genetics, Pharmacogenetics and Personalization of Therapy of the world level at the State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation "Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician B.V. Petrovsky", the main focus of which will be pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, which will actively interact with the Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education and other scientific, educational and medical organizations [6].

Personalized medicine, the core of which is pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, is today on the threshold of a new revolution, and our journal intends to be not just a witness, but an active driver of these transformations. In the coming years, we expect a significant shift in the focus of published research:

  • from single genes to multi-omics approaches: articles will increasingly reflect the synergy of data from pharmacogenomics (DNA variations), transcriptomics (RNA expression), proteomics, metabolomics (metabolite profiles) and even microbiomics. Such an integrative “multi-omics” approach is necessary for building complex individualized predictive models of drug response;
  • the rise of artificial intelligence: machine learning and artificial intelligence methods will form the basis for creating highly accurate predictive models of the development of ADRs and resistance. These models will take into account not dozens, but hundreds of parameters - from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gene copy number variations (CNVs) to epigenetic marks (DNA methylation), intestinal microbiota profiles and clinical and laboratory parameters of a particular patient;
  • accessibility as an ethical imperative: a key strategic goal for the next decade is to reduce the cost of whole genome sequencing to the level of routine diagnostic testing hundred (guideline ≤5000 rubles). Achieving this goal will make pharmacogenetic information available not only in specialized centers, but also in primary health care, radically changing the approach to prescribing therapy. We will actively publish studies on cost-effectiveness and ways to reduce testing costs.

The journal's tenth anniversary is, of course, a reason for legitimate pride for our entire team of authors, reviewers and readers. But above all, it is a moment of increased responsibility. Pharmacogenetics has finally ceased to be a beautiful theory or "medicine of the distant future" - it has become a real tool capable of saving lives and improving their quality here and now. However, to fully realize its colossal potential, it is necessary:

  • bold clinical decisions: doctors of all specialties should more actively implement pharmacogenetic algorithms for dosing and choosing drugs, validated in studies, published on the pages of our and other authoritative journals, into their daily practice;
  • interdisciplinary collaboration: breakthroughs are only possible at the intersection of sciences. It is necessary to combine the efforts of clinical pharmacologists, medical geneticists, clinical laboratory diagnostics specialists, clinicians, bioinformaticians, IT specialists and epidemiologists to create comprehensive solutions;
  • support for citizen science: projects for responsible collection of data on population variability of pharmacogenetic markers in various regions of Russia in compliance with ethical standards can play an important role, while, in fact, we are talking about the National Biobank.

Future developments in pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics

We predict that pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics will cease to be auxiliary tools and will become the basis of clinical practice. If 2003 (the completion of the Human Genome Project) marked the beginning of the genomics era, then 2030 will be the year of its maturity, when a patient’s genetic passport will be as routine an element of a patient’s medical history as a blood type or an ECG [7]. The drivers of this transformation will be a technological explosion (reducing the cost of whole-genome sequencing to ≤5,000 rubles, real-time artificial intelligence algorithms), a regulatory revolution (mandatory predictive testing for key drugs), and a change in the healthcare paradigm — the transition from “disease treatment” to “prediction and prevention of individual risks”. Technological breakthroughs will radically change the landscape. It can be assumed that in the future, a complete rejection of targeted panels in favor of WGS (whole-genome sequencing) as a standard for primary diagnostics is possible. This will be possible due to the reduction in the cost of analysis [8], reduction in the execution time to ≤1 hour (due to nanosecond chips) and deep integration with electronic medical records with automatic generation of therapeutic recommendations [9]. The emergence of a “genetic passport at birth” is expected in 80% of developed countries [10].

Artificial intelligence will evolve from analysis to accurate prediction. Neural networks will appear that predict adverse reactions, taking into account >500 parameters (SNP, DNA methylation, metabolomic markers, epidemiological data). They will provide a forecast of the risk of adverse reactions with an accuracy of ≥95% for drugs with a narrow therapeutic window, such as warfarin or carbamazepine [11]. The introduction of digital pharmaceutical avatars (doubles) — personalized simulators based on patient WGS data, allowing in silico testing of the efficacy and toxicity of drug combinations before their actual administration — will be revolutionary [12].

Isolated genome analysis will finally give way to multi-omic convergence. Integrative models will combine data from pharmacogenomics (DNA), proteomics (proteins), transcriptomics (RNA), metabolomics (metabolites), and microbiome analysis (intestinal flora) [13].

Clinical transformations will affect all areas of clinical medicine. In oncology, the use of NGS panels of ≥500 genes for all solid tumors will become routine. The focus will finally shift from cancer localization to its molecular profile: diagnoses will sound like “ALK-positive carcinoma” instead of “lung cancer” or “BRCA-deficient carcinoma” instead of “ovarian cancer”. The concept of neoadjuvant pharmacogenomic prophylaxis may become widespread –– preventive administration of drugs by carriers of highly penetrant mutations 5-10 years before the potential development of cancer. In psychiatry, pharmacogenetic testing will become mandatory before prescribing psychotropic drugs. In primary health care, we can expect the introduction of pharmacogenetic patient cards, with clinical interpretation being carried out with the participation of a clinical pharmacologist, within the framework of specialized telemedicine centers. Implantable biosensors for continuous monitoring of drug concentrations will become available (for example, methotrexate) with automatic dose adjustment via artificial intelligence algorithms.

Social and ethical challenges will require active solutions. The problem of genetic inequality, when access to pharmacogenetic testing remains limited, will require an initiative to create cheap PCR tests for a limited number of the most clinically significant pharmacogenetic markers with very low cost. Data confidentiality will be guaranteed: a ban on the commercial use of WGS data without the explicit consent of the patient, the right to "genetic oblivion" (complete deletion of data from cloud storage) and the introduction of cryptographic protection of DNA information using quantum encryption. For Russia, three strategies will be key. Ethnopharmacogenetics will be developed, which is necessary for prioritizing the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in various regions. It is expected that educational programs (specialty, residency, postgraduate studies, advanced training) in the field of clinical pharmacogenetics will be introduced more widely, focusing on the interpretation of pharmacogenetic reports, the basics of bioinformatics and resolving ethical dilemmas.

We assume that in the future, the phrase "standard dose" will disappear from the lexicon of doctors, and each drug prescription will be based on a triad: a lifelong genetic passport (WGS profile), a dynamic phenotype (wearable sensor data) and a prognosis by artificial intelligence (individual risk models). The future lies in integrating pharmacogenetics into comprehensive and large-scale clinical and pharmacological counseling of patients, including using telemedicine.

Conclusion

As Paracelsus wisely noted: "The dose makes the poison of the medicine." We, the heirs of his ideas in the era of genomics, dare to add: "Knowledge of the genome makes the dose a salvation." Ahead of us lies a decade of amazing discoveries and transformations in medicine, and the journal "Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics" will be a faithful companion and assistant to all who follow this path.

The editors express their deepest gratitude to more than 600 authors from Russia, the CIS countries and far abroad, whose research, ideas and discussions have filled the pages of the journal for 10 years. We address special gratitude to our esteemed reviewers. Your invaluable work, deep expertise, constructive criticism and exceptionally strict selection of manuscripts are the main guarantor of the high scientific level and reliability of the published materials. Your work is invisible to the reader, but it is fundamental to the success of the publication.

References

1. William Osler (July 12, 1849 – December 29, 1919). Режим доступа: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Osler

2. Gerasimova KV, Sychev DA. Clinical pharmacogenetics : historical essay. Medical technologies. Assessment and choice. 2012;3(9): 87-94. (In Russ.)

3. Klingenberg M. Pigments of rat liver microsomes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1958 Jun;75(2):376-86. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(58)90436-3.

4. Garfinkel D. Studies on pig liver microsomes. I. Enzymic and pigment composition of different microsomal fractions. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1958 Oct;77(2):493-509. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(58)90095-x.

5. Chernov AA, Mirzaev KB, Sychev DA. The first meta-analysis of domestic pharmacogenetic studies of clopidogrel. Farmakogenetika i farmakogenomika = Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics. 2015;(2):19-23. (In Russ.)

6. A world-class genomic research center will be created at the State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation "Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician B.V. Petrovsky". https://med.ru/news/v-gosudarstvennom-nauchnom-tsentre-rf-rntskh-im-akad-b-v-petrovskogo-budet-sozdan-tsentr-genomnykh-i/.

7. Denny JC, Collins FS. Precision medicine in 2030-seven ways to transform healthcare. Cell. 2021 Mar 18;184(6):1415-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.015.

8. DNA Sequencing Costs: Data. Режим доступа: https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/DNA-Sequencing-Costs-Data.

9. Parekh AE, Shaikh OA, Simran, Manan S, Hasibuzzaman MA. Artificial intelligence (AI) in personalized medicine: AI-generated personalized therapy regimens based on genetic and medical history: short communication. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 13;85(11):5831-5833. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001320.

10. Shah N, Brlek P, Bulić L, et al. Genomic sequencing for newborn screening: current perspectives and challenges. Croat Med J. 2024 Jun 13;65(3):261-267. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.261.

11. Tang W, Chen J, Wang Z, et al. Deep learning for predicting toxicity of chemicals : a mini review. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2018;36(4):252-271. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2018.1537563.

12. Arsène S, Parès Y, Tixier E, et al. In Silico Clinical Trials: Is It Possible? Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2716:51-99. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3_4.

13. Yao L, Wang JT, Jayasinghe RG, et al. Single-Cell Discovery and Multiomic Characterization of Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Res. 2023 Apr 14;83(8):1214-1233. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1769.


About the Authors

D. A. Sychev
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician B.V. Petrovsky
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Sychev, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director of the Center, Head of the Department

World-Class Genomic Research Center “Center for Predictive Genetics, Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Therapy”; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy named after B.E. Votchal

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest



D. Yu. Belousov
Center for Pharmacoeconomics Research LLC
Russian Federation

Dmitry Yu. Belousov, General Director

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest



K. B. Mirzaev
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician B.V. Petrovsky
Russian Federation

Karin B. Mirzaev, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Assosiate Professor, Deputy Head of the Center, Professor

World-Class Genomic Research Center “Center for Predictive Genetics, Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Therapy”; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy named after B.E. Votcha

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The author declares no conflict of interest



What is already known on this topic?

  • Pharmacogenetics is not a new science; it has deep historical roots dating back to the early 20th century (initial descriptions of pharmacogenetic phenomena, discovery of cytochrome P450).
  • It has evolved from studying isolated adverse drug reactions to a systemic understanding of the polygenic nature of the response to most drugs.
  • Associations have been established between polymorphisms in specific genes (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, TPMT, DPYD, etc.) and drug efficacy/safety.
  • Implementation into clinical practice in the Russian Federation faces significant barriers: insufficient integration into clinical guidelines, economic constraints, regulatory gaps, and a lack of knowledge among physicians.

What does this article add new?

  • The article presents a strategic program and vision for the development of pharmacogenetics in Russia for the next decade (until 2035).
  • It announces the creation of new large-scale infrastructure projects: a National DNA Biobank, a National Pharmacogenetic Knowledge Base, and a clinical decision support system (CDSS).
  • It defines the specific technological trends the discipline will focus on: a shift towards multiomics approaches (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics), active use of artificial intelligence for risk prediction, and reducing the cost of whole-genome sequencing.
  • It outlines plans to establish a world-class Center for Predictive Genetics and Pharmacogenetics.

How might this influence clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

  • A paradigm shift in prescribing: Moving from the concept of a "standard dose" to personalized prescription based on a genetic passport, sensor data, and AI prediction.
  • Increased accessibility: Reduced testing costs will make it a routine procedure not only in major centers but also in primary healthcare.
  • Integration into clinical guidelines: The developed algorithms and models will be directly embedded into treatment standards and drug labels.
  • Emergence of new services: Creation of drug information centers and the development of telemedicine consultations with clinical pharmacologists for test interpretation.
  • Proactive medicine: In oncology, the concept of "pharmacogenomic prophylaxis" for carriers of high-risk mutations may emerge.
  • Mandatory testing: In fields like psychiatry, pharmacogenetic testing may become mandatory prior to prescribing therapy.

Review

For citations:


Sychev D.A., Belousov D.Yu., Mirzaev K.B. Ten years at the forefront of personalized medicine: from achievements to future transformation. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2025;(1):3-8. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2025-1-3-8. EDN: STSYZB

Views: 611


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0527 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8849 (Online)