Effect of ATIC, ADA, ITPA, and AMPD1 gene polymorphisms on the efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis
https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2024-1-4-13
EDN: KCZHLK
Abstract
Relevance. Methotrexate (MT) is the most prescribed baseline anti-inflammatory drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The reason for withdrawal of the drug is mostly because of its ineffectiveness, which is determined by the genetic characteristics of patients. Predicting the response to MT remains an urgent task in practical medicine.
Objective. To evaluate the influence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms of ATIC, AMPD1, ADA and ITPA genes on MT efficacy in RA.
Materials and methods. The study group included patients with a reliable diagnosis of RA who received MT. After 6 months of therapy, the efficacy was monitored by the dynamics of the DAS28 index (Disease Activity Score). Genotyping of polymorphisms rs2372536 (C347G), rs244076 (T>C), rs17602729 (C34T), and rs1127354 (C94A) was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Allele and genotype distribution frequencies of polymorphisms in patients with different MT efficacy levels were analyzed. To assess the reliability (p) of differences, χ2 was used. The strength of association of traits was evaluated by the odds ratio (OR).
Results. The C allele of the ATIC rs2372536 polymorphism was predominant in responders: 230 (68 %) versus the G allele 110 (32 %) (p = 0.073, OR [95% CI] 0.7 [0.5; 1.0] at the trend level. The frequency of occurrence of the CC genotype of ATIC rs2372536 was significantly higher in responders 80 (47%) than in non-responders 41 (33 %) (p = 0.016, OR = 0.6 [0.3; 0.9]. At the same time, the CG genotype was significantly more prevalent in non-responders 68 (55 %) than in responders 70 (41%) (р = 0.021, OR = 1.7 [1.09; 2.8]. The TC genotype of the ADA rs244076 polymorphism was more frequent at the trend level in non-responders 33 (27 %) versus 33 (18 %) in responders (p = 0.064, OR = 1.7 [0.9; 2.9]. There was no difference in the genotype and allele distribution of ITPA rs1127354 and AMPD1 rs 17602729 polymorphisms between responders and non-responders. The CG genotype of the ATIC rs2372536 polymorphism was associated with the response to MT in codominant and superdominant inheritance models: CG vs. GG, p = 0.042, OR = 1.9 [1.15; 3.13]; CG vs. CC + GG, p = 0.02, OR = 1.73 [1.09; 2.77], respectively. In the dominant model, CG + GG vs. CC genotypes were predominant in responders: p = 0.016, OR = 1.80 [1.11; 2.91]. The dominant model of inheritance was the most significant, with the lowest Akaike information criterion value of 398.5. The data indicate a trend toward a higher frequency of the TC genotype of the ADA rs244076 polymorphism in responders in the super dominant model: TC vs. TT + CC, p = 0.066, OR = 1.69 [0.97; 2.96].
Conclusion. MT efficacy is associated with ATIC rs2372536 and ADA rs 244076 polymorphisms. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms ITPA rs1127354 and AMPD1 rs17602729 do not independently contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of MT in patients with RA. The dominant inheritance pattern of the ATIC rs2372536 gene is the most significant for predicting the efficacy of MT therapy in RA.
About the Authors
I. V. DevaldRussian Federation
Inessa V. Devald, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med), Associate professor of the Department of Therapy,
Chelyabinsk.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
E. A. Khodus
Russian Federation
Elena A. Khodus PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med), Rheumatologist,
Chelyabinsk.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
K. Yu. Myslivtsova
Russian Federation
Kristina Y. Myslivtsova, Rheumatologist,
Chelyabinsk.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
E. B. Khromova
Russian Federation
Elena B. Khromova PhD, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Head of the donor register,
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
G. L. Ignatova
Russian Federation
Galina L. Ignatova Professor, Head of the Department of Therapy,
Chelyabinsk.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
A. M. Lila
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Lila PhD, Dr. Sci. (Med), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Director; Head of the Department of Rheumatology,
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
D. S. Stashkevich
Russian Federation
Darya S. Stashkevich, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor of the Department of Microbiology, Immunology and General Biology, Dean of the Faculty of Biology,
Chelyabinsk.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
1. Nasonov EL. Revmatologiya: Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. 2-e izd. GEOTAR Media; 2010. (In Russ.).
2. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):685-699. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655.
3. Friedman B, Cronstein B. Methotrexate mechanism in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2019 May;86(3):301-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.07.004.
4. Rezaei H, Saevarsdottir S, Forslind K, et al. In early rheumatoid arthritis, patients with a good initial response to methotrexate have excellent 2-year clinical outcomes, but radiological progression is not fully prevented: data from the methotrexate responders population in the SWEFOT trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Feb;71(2):186-91. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200038.
5. Sychev DA. Prikladnaya farmakogenetika: Monografiya. Moscow, Tver': OOO "Izdatel'stvo «Triada»; 2021. (In Russ.).
6. Home - SNP - NCBI [Internet]. [cited2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/
7. PubMed [Internet]. [cited2023 Mar28]. PubMed. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
8. PharmGKB [Internet]. [cited2023 Mar 28]. PharmGKB. Available from: https://www.pharmgkb.org/
9. Rebrova O. Yu. Statisticheskii analiz meditsinskikh dannykh. Primenenie paketa prikladnykh programm Statistica (3-e izdanie). Moscow: Media Sphera Publishers, 2006. (In Russ.).
10. Kutikhin AG, Yuzhalin AE, Ponasenko AV. How to analyze and present genetic epidemiology data in candidate studies. Fundamental and clinical medicine. 2017;2(2):77-82. (In Russ.). doi: 10.23946/2500-0764-2017-2-2-77-82.
11. Dervieux T, Wessels JA, van der Straaten T, et al. Gene-gene interactions in folate and adenosine biosynthesis pathways affect methotrexate efficacy and tolerability in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009 Dec;19(12):935-44. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32833315d1.
12. Lima A, Bernardes M, Azevedo R, et al. Moving toward personalized medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: SNPs in methotrexate intracellular pathways are associated with methotrexate therapeutic outcome. Pharmacogenomics. 2016 Oct;17(15):1649-1674. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0067.
13. Kurzawski M, Malinowski D, Szarmach N, et al. ATIC missense variant affects response to methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2016 Dec;17(18):1971-1978. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0125.14.
14. Singh A, Gangadharan H, Gupta V, et al. Polymorphism of genes involved in methotrexate pathway: Predictors of response to methotrexate therapy in Indian rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 May;24(5):654-662. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14100.
15. Lee YC, Cui J, Costenbader KH, et al. Investigation of candidate polymorphisms and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients on methotrexate. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Jun;48(6):613-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken513.
16. Owen SA, Hider SL, Martin P, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in key methotrexate pathway genes are associated with response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013 Jun;13(3):227-34. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2012.7.
17. Takatori R, Takahashi KA, Tokunaga D, et al. ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism influences methotrexate sensitivity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):546-54.
18. Eektimmerman F, Swen JJ, Madhar MB, et al. Predictive genetic biomarkers for the efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Apr;20(2):159-168. doi: 10.1038/s41397-019-0098-9.
19. Eektimmerman F, Allaart CF, Hazes JM, et al. Validation of a clinical pharmacogenetic model to predict methotrexate nonresponse in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2019 Jan;20(2):85-93. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2018-0144.
20. Jenko B, Tomšič M, Jekić B, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetic Models of Treatment Response to Methotrexate Monotherapy in Slovenian and Serbian Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Differences in Patient's Management May Preclude Generalization of the Models. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jan 25;9:20. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00020.
Review
For citations:
Devald I.V., Khodus E.A., Myslivtsova K.Yu., Khromova E.B., Ignatova G.L., Lila A.M., Stashkevich D.S. Effect of ATIC, ADA, ITPA, and AMPD1 gene polymorphisms on the efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2024;(1):4-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0527-2024-1-4-13. EDN: KCZHLK